 | | Re: 1x1 and 2x2 chess sets
|
|
(...) Oh, definitely. Haven't looked at many cone parts in L3P, have you? The 3x3x2 cone especially needs extensive work. Steve (26 years ago, 4-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.build)
|
| |
| | instructions wanted
|
|
i am desperatly seeking the instructions to the folowing sets... 1524 1547 1580 1596 1794 dragon masters chariot 1843 royal knights catapult 1917 2586 king on throne 6008 royal king 6011 cart with grey chest 6035 castle guard 6060 knights challenge (...) (26 years ago, 4-Mar-99, to lugnet.build)
|
| |
| | RE: Flattened Primitives (was Re: 1x1 and 2x2 chess sets)
|
|
(...) No, sorry, wrong word, I didn't mean part authors are lazy! Because POV is a ray tracer, it needs to calculate transformations backwards and therefore it calculates inverse matrices. If a matrix is singular it cannot be inverted, so POV won't (...) (26 years ago, 4-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad, lugnet.build)
|
| |
| | Re: SpiderWalker rides again!
|
|
(...) circular plates? Did you use cone light sources or ordinary ones? I bet it took a lot of experimenting before you got the scene like that! Oh, and by the way, to make the scene even more creepy, you can add some ground fog, or perhaps some (...) (26 years ago, 4-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.build)
|
| |
| | (canceled)
|
|
|
| |
| | Re: SpiderWalker rides again!
|
|
(...) It's not often I can call a Lego scene creepy. -- Terry K -- (26 years ago, 4-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.build)
|
| |
| | Re: SpiderWalker rides again!
|
|
(...) todd.. you are an *extremely* creative (and sick) individual and i one day hope to have your level of imagination (and obvious free time) and your talent (or should i say "sociopathic tendancies"??? hehe!) J (26 years ago, 4-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.build)
|
| |
| | SpiderWalker rides again!
|
|
Remember that icky creepy crawly SpiderWalker model a couple years ago? (URL) a new picture of it -- at night: (URL) instructions in LDraw MPD format: (URL) (26 years ago, 4-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.build)
|
| |
| | Re: 1x1 and 2x2 chess sets
|
|
(...) Good answer, but not the one I was looking for. :-) What I meant to ask is: do the current cones need to get the same/similar fix as the 1x1 cone? -- Terry K -- (26 years ago, 3-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.build)
|
| |
| | Re: Flattened Primitives (was Re: 1x1 and 2x2 chess sets)
|
|
(...) I doubt it's laziness, since a default insertion has a 1 in the yy column. There was talk in the primitives group about using the discs and rings for cones. Since we would have to go through and "fix" any parts which put a 1 in the yy column, (...) (26 years ago, 3-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad, lugnet.build)
|
