|
|
 | | Re: Website
|
| (...) Yep. I know exactly what you mean, though (although I haven't done any microfig scale stuff. I like the challenge of fitting a minifig into all my models...and recently I've also been interested in Miniland scale stuff--like the muscle cars I (...) (25 years ago, 16-Mar-00, to lugnet.publish, lugnet.build.mecha)
| | | | | Re: Website
|
| (...) Currently, I have .dat and .mpd assigned to L3Lab 'cause its fastest and can handle MPDs. Mouse rotation is nifty too. My only problem is that when I want to see how something is built, "refresh after every part" is still too fast to follow :/ (...) (25 years ago, 16-Mar-00, to lugnet.publish, lugnet.build.mecha)
| | | | | Re: Website
|
| I guess my question is: What app are most folks using? I'd want to address the widest audience possible. Hmm...sounds like a question for lugnet.cad... Ben -- Ben Vaughan ben@marsbase.com (URL) <jsproat@io.com> wrote in message (...) (25 years ago, 16-Mar-00, to lugnet.publish, lugnet.build.mecha)
| | | | | Re: Website
|
| (...) I've mapped both dat and mpd to ldlite. I had them set to l3lab for a while; l3lab didn't come up as quickly as it pops up dialog boxes if it hits any errors in the file which slows down the action. I think I remember seeing some folks mapping (...) (25 years ago, 16-Mar-00, to lugnet.publish, lugnet.build.mecha)
| | | | | Re: Website
|
| So...would it be better to map .dat to ldraw.exe or ldlite, or l3lab.exe or mlcad? What about mpd files? Ben -- Ben Vaughan ben@marsbase.com (URL) <jsproat@io.com> wrote in message news:FrHFGJ.9I6@lugnet.com... (...) the (...) (25 years ago, 16-Mar-00, to lugnet.publish, lugnet.build.mecha)
|
|
