 | | Re: New 2004 Designer Set Mecha
|
|
(...) Hm, the FTX messed up the link: (URL) (21 years ago, 6-Feb-04, to lugnet.build.mecha)
|
| |
| | New 2004 Designer Set Mecha
|
|
I didn't see anyone post about this in Mecha, so here goes: (URL) fun. -mark (21 years ago, 6-Feb-04, to lugnet.build.mecha, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: B.I. Joe: S.N.A.K.E. Battle Armor
|
|
In lugnet.space, David Laswell wrote: Not true! Scarlett ('82) was in the very first wave of 4" Joes, and as the (...) David > Chris ~GA (21 years ago, 6-Feb-04, to lugnet.space, lugnet.build.mecha)
|
| |
| | Re: B.I. Joe: S.N.A.K.E. Battle Armor
|
|
(...) Not true! Scarlett ('82) was in the very first wave of 4" Joes, and as the line progressed Cover Girl ('83) and Lady Jaye ('85) were added. For those who liked 'em dressed in black leather, there was always the Baroness ('84). And for those (...) (21 years ago, 6-Feb-04, to lugnet.space, lugnet.build.mecha)
|
| |
| | Defense Appropriations approved (New MOCs)
|
|
For your viewing pleasure, more tasty hardware from the Ceti Republic: Cougar II A1: (URL) (New cupola, extra sensor gear.) Lynx Armored Vehicle: (URL) (Variants shown are Mortar Carrier and Battlefield Command systems.) Jaguar Light Tank: (URL) (...) (21 years ago, 6-Feb-04, to lugnet.space, lugnet.build.military, lugnet.announce.moc, FTX)
|
| |
| | Defense Appropriations approved (New MOCs)
|
|
For your viewing pleasure, more tasty hardware from the Ceti Republic: Cougar II A1: (URL) (New cupola, extra sensor gear.) Lynx Armored Vehicle: (URL) (Variants shown are Mortar Carrier and Battlefield Command systems.) Jaguar Light Tank: (URL) (...) (21 years ago, 6-Feb-04, to lugnet.space, lugnet.build.military, lugnet.announce.moc, FTX) !
|
| |
| | Re: New Mecha - The Rizmit
|
|
(...) Sweet Jesus on a minibike, that is a beautiful piece of work. Hope to see it in person someday. Soren (21 years ago, 6-Feb-04, to lugnet.build.mecha, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Pair of Armored Mechs
|
|
(...) Wow! Those are awesome! The chunky shape works beautifully. They're big, they're clunky, they look like they're going to tear something apart. The way you did the head, with the sensors and stuff, is excellent! -Mark (21 years ago, 6-Feb-04, to lugnet.build.mecha)
|
| |
| | Re: CVN - 65 USS Enterprise Aircraft Carrier MOC
|
|
(...) That's excellent! The shape is spot on and the little details are wonderful...ie. the command tower and the peek into the hanger from the aft. Very cool! Cheers, -Gil (21 years ago, 6-Feb-04, to lugnet.build.military)
|
| |
| | Re: New Mecha - The Rizmit
|
|
(...) Hi Eric, Still a nice work..... :-) may be you are the best constructor .... Regards Chris. (21 years ago, 6-Feb-04, to lugnet.build.mecha, FTX)
|
| |
| | Pair of Armored Mechs
|
|
Hello .Mecha! Here are some mechs. They're a little taller than Bionicle Toas. I was quite glad to find a use for those odd corner parts from set 6441. And these are definitely not inspired by Gundam. At all. Seriously. Uh-huh. Pictures: (URL) pics (...) (21 years ago, 6-Feb-04, to lugnet.build.mecha)
|
| |
| | Re: New Mecha - The Rizmit
|
|
Fo Shizzle My Rizzle...E this is a nice addition to your fine family of mecha. This one looks like the drunken uncle who shows up at your house during the holidays and drinks all your beer. I dig the hand design, but as usual, I give you highest (...) (21 years ago, 6-Feb-04, to lugnet.build.mecha, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Crimson Skies
|
|
(...) I don't think it's the shape of your plane that makes it a stretch for CS as much as it's the high-tech looking weaponry. Exchange that stuff for some large primitive looking machine guns and I think you'd be a lot closer to the CS style... (...) (21 years ago, 6-Feb-04, to lugnet.space, lugnet.build.military, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: B.I. Joe: S.N.A.K.E. Battle Armor
|
|
(...) I once knew someone with funnybuns who beat me up because I pointed them out. Dave! FUT lugnet.humor.sophomoric (21 years ago, 6-Feb-04, to lugnet.space, lugnet.build.mecha, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Crimson Skies
|
|
(...) While I like Andrews plane, and can see where you classify it as 'conventional', my question is - how unconventional is too unconventional? I know this borders on threadjacking or bumping, but I've been wondering if my (URL) latest bird> was (...) (21 years ago, 6-Feb-04, to lugnet.space, lugnet.build.military, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: B.I. Joe: S.N.A.K.E. Battle Armor
|
|
(...) Thanks for clearing that up! I read it as "1983 is early in the line" ... (...) There's a depressing thought. Either someone with funnybuns (Leia) or someone who could beat you up if you made a false move. (21 years ago, 6-Feb-04, to lugnet.space, lugnet.build.mecha, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: CVN - 65 USS Enterprise Aircraft Carrier MOC
|
|
(...) I just saw this looking around on brickshelf yesterday, and was very impressed. I like that you managed to capture the shape of the carrier in a relatively small MOC. Daniel Rubin (21 years ago, 6-Feb-04, to lugnet.build.military)
|
| |
| | Re: The P-38 Lightning Space Contest
|
|
(...) Here is my entry. This is the first MOC in years. I must say that it took me longer than I expected. I guess that "thinking in bricks" has left me somewhat. I started construction with the wheel-in-wheel engine fronts. The tails were a bit (...) (21 years ago, 6-Feb-04, to lugnet.build.contests, lugnet.space, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Crimson Skies
|
|
(...) Not really. I don't think you understand what I was trying to point out. Your plane follows the very typical composition with two large wings forward, with a standard tail design. It looks like any given forward-prop-driven plane dating from (...) (21 years ago, 6-Feb-04, to lugnet.space, lugnet.build.military, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: B.I. Joe: S.N.A.K.E. Battle Armor
|
|
(...) Um, he said 1983. He means the early years of the 1983 toy line and the first of the smaller sized Joe figures from 1983. See he said 1983. Not the dolls... but action figures, in 1983. That's what he ment. (Info taken from the Department of (...) (21 years ago, 6-Feb-04, to lugnet.space, lugnet.build.mecha, FTX)
|
