 | | Re: what defines a MOC as blacktron? was: (2nd Annual Space Building Contest)
|
|
(...) *sigh* My bad <-- See I can fess up! I looked it up, it was a BT2 thing in the 1991 US/CA catalog. So not a BT1 story, per se. -Jason (23 years ago, 19-Nov-01, to lugnet.build.contests)
|
| |
| | Re: Group Building Experiment
|
|
Step four! (URL) no camera, so it's LDRAW for me. Feel free to take and add onto the DAT file I made to keep track of things. benjamin (23 years ago, 19-Nov-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.build)
|
| |
| | Re: Group Building Experiment
|
|
I'll take step four, I had already thrown together something for step three but got beaten to the punch... let me incorporate the previous bits and I'll post the next step! benjamin "Mark Nelson" <3nelsons@pressenter.com> wrote in message (...) (23 years ago, 19-Nov-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.build)
|
| |
| | Re: Group Building Experiment
|
|
In lugnet.space, Steve Runnels said: (...) That would be me! (URL) Nelson LCC Command: (URL) (23 years ago, 19-Nov-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.build)
|
| |
| | Re: When is a Slope not a Roof Tile? (WAS: we want....a shrubbery)
|
|
(...) Doh! Yes, my apologies to both countries :) KL (23 years ago, 19-Nov-01, to lugnet.build)
|
| |
| | Re: When is a Slope not a Roof Tile? (WAS: we want....a shrubbery)
|
|
(...) Ummm... The 2xN slopes are 45 degrees. In LDraw measures, the sloped surface is 20LDU deep x 20LDU high. Of course, the 4LDU lip at the bottom of the part throws off the overall slope when you build with these pieces. The sloped surface on the (...) (23 years ago, 19-Nov-01, to lugnet.build)
|
| |
| | Re: When is a Slope not a Roof Tile? (WAS: we want....a shrubbery)
|
|
"KL" == Kevin Loch <kloch@opnsys.com> writes: KL> Their names are derived from poorly translated Dutch names, based on KL> a naming convention that fell apart after they added the 2x3 KL> brick. s/Dutch/Danish/, I presume? KL> KL Cheers, Johannes. (...) (23 years ago, 19-Nov-01, to lugnet.build)
|
| |
| | Re: When is a Slope not a Roof Tile? (WAS: we want....a shrubbery)
|
|
(...) It is well known that our names are far superior to the "official" TLC names. Their names are derived from poorly translated Dutch names, based on a naming convention that fell apart after they added the 2x3 brick. Basically they just make the (...) (23 years ago, 19-Nov-01, to lugnet.build)
|
| |
| | Re: Opinion on the Sopwith Camel?
|
|
(...) If the engine spins with the propellor, then it is a rotary engine, and it is correct, see this link for more detail, (URL) . In reality, the rotary engine packed so much torque that inexperience pilots routinely crashed flying the Camel. (...) (23 years ago, 19-Nov-01, to lugnet.build.sculpture)
|
| |
| | Re: Opinion on the Sopwith Camel?
|
|
(...) Here's a review that should help you make your decision: (URL) (23 years ago, 19-Nov-01, to lugnet.build.sculpture)
|
