|
|
 | | Re: lugnet.space.mecha?
|
| (...) Best suggestion? Why not have an @ link on the Space page like there already is for Star Wars? Keep mecha in its current place but also give it visibility in space. Peter (23 years ago, 17-Jul-01, to lugnet.build.mecha, lugnet.space, lugnet.general)
| | | | | Re: lugnet.space.mecha?
|
| (...) Check the charter for .space: <QUOTE> lugnet.space– LEGO SYSTEM Space™: products (information, opinions, reviews, etc.); building (settings, contexts, characters, projects, models, layouts, plans, tools, tips, etc.); inspiration (ideas, (...) (23 years ago, 17-Jul-01, to lugnet.build.mecha, lugnet.space, lugnet.general)
| | | | | Re: lugnet.space.mecha?
|
| (...) I agree completely with everything Jeremy said. Peter, wouldn't there be a lot more traffic on LUGNET if a *big* banner was posted on www.yahoo.com? Yes, but that isn't going to happen anytime soon. IMHO if you really want to learn more about (...) (23 years ago, 17-Jul-01, to lugnet.build.mecha, lugnet.space, lugnet.general)
| | | | | Re: lugnet.space.mecha?
|
| (...) First, that's not true. Little of the discussion on .space is about the official space theme, although you're right that mecha tends to focus on building techniques than .space Second, consider this: How many LUGNET users would be extremely (...) (23 years ago, 17-Jul-01, to lugnet.build.mecha, lugnet.space, lugnet.general)
| | | | | Re: A nice summer surprise
|
| (...) LEGO® has done plenty to undermine its good name on its own, thankyouverymuch, and the presence of a viable competitor can only serve to remind LEGO® that market solvency is by no means assured. I don't mind or refute that LUGNET-at-large is a (...) (23 years ago, 17-Jul-01, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.build, lugnet.general, lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands)
|
|
