 | | Re: lugnet.belville has got on it's feet! —Steve Bliss
|
| | | (...) Yeah, they were sort of girlie-girl. (...) That doesn't make them *look* better. Those faces are just weird. I think they're getting better, but they have a blank, staring quality. Oh, well. They're head-and-shoulders above Playmobil. In both (...) (25 years ago, 18-Jan-00, to lugnet.belville, lugnet.general)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: lugnet.belville has got on it's feet! —Jeff Thompson
|
| | | | | (...) Long before the Ninja castle line was introduced, I thought that the Belville figures would make good Ninja figures, due to their posability. You could actually make them grip a katana with both hands. -- jthompson@esker.com "Float on a river, (...) (25 years ago, 18-Jan-00, to lugnet.belville, lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: lugnet.belville has got on it's feet! —Frank Filz
|
| | | | (...) I could probably spare a couple figs (I have several copies of 5846, almost 2 sets of 5890 figs, plus perhaps a few extras). (...) You don't want to know how many of those I have... Actually, I do have a plan to use some of the pink ones as a (...) (25 years ago, 18-Jan-00, to lugnet.belville, lugnet.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: lugnet.belville has got on it's feet! —Tamyra Teed
|
| | | | Not to be a pain in the butt here.. though could someone please take the general followup off here ???? Thanks Tamy (...) (25 years ago, 18-Jan-00, to lugnet.belville)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: lugnet.belville has got on its feet! —Shiri Dori
|
| | | | (...) Not to be one either.. but just in general do you have anything against belville? If so, PLEASE come out and say it, 'cause (as Suzanne mentioned) it's (1) very interesting. If not, why can't we continue our discussion in .general? (...) (...) (25 years ago, 19-Jan-00, to lugnet.belville)
|
| | | | |
