 | | Re: lugnet.belville has got on it's feet! —Richard Marchetti
| | | | (...) Hey, everyone likes everything for parts -- parts is what its about. The real problem is one of scale, and secondarily one of price. Belville figs means having to go to another scale in building and for a theme where the figures available are (...) (25 years ago, 16-Jan-00, to lugnet.belville, lugnet.general)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: lugnet.belville has got on it's feet! —Frank Filz
| | | | | | Richard Marchetti wrote in message ... (...) real (...) WAY (...) or (...) these (...) my (...) What would be really neat is if the figures/dolls were sold separately (not just in addition to, but not be in the sets). The sets might still contain (...) (25 years ago, 16-Jan-00, to lugnet.belville, lugnet.general)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | Re: lugnet.belville has got on it's feet! —Shiri Dori
| | | | | | | (...) This is a good idea, but it's pretty obvious (IMO) that TLG wouldn't do it. Two basic reasons: 1. This would reduce the price of the set for YOU, meaning it will reduce the profit of TLG - you pay less, and (as you said) not too many people (...) (25 years ago, 16-Jan-00, to lugnet.belville, lugnet.general)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | Re: lugnet.belville has got on it's feet! —Shiri Dori
| | | | | (...) I see what you mean. I hate the prices too, and the scale IS tough to deal with. (...) Yup. And sorrowfully enough, I would do the same thing, and probably so would everybody else. (...) Do you mean the Good Fairy Queen? Or the evil (...) (25 years ago, 16-Jan-00, to lugnet.belville, lugnet.general)
| | | | | | |
