 | | Re: lugnet.belville has got on it's feet!
|
|
(...) I could probably spare a couple figs (I have several copies of 5846, almost 2 sets of 5890 figs, plus perhaps a few extras). (...) You don't want to know how many of those I have... Actually, I do have a plan to use some of the pink ones as a (...) (25 years ago, 18-Jan-00, to lugnet.belville, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: lugnet.belville has got on it's feet!
|
|
(...) Long before the Ninja castle line was introduced, I thought that the Belville figures would make good Ninja figures, due to their posability. You could actually make them grip a katana with both hands. -- jthompson@esker.com "Float on a river, (...) (25 years ago, 18-Jan-00, to lugnet.belville, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Quick review of the Belville Yacht
|
|
(...) I think the fact that it's a Belville set with *function* is very cool. Most Belville sets are very simple backdrops for pretend-play. The closest we get to Belville which does something is a swing or a slide. So having a floating boat is very (...) (25 years ago, 18-Jan-00, to lugnet.reviews, lugnet.belville)
|
| |
| | Re: lugnet.belville has got on it's feet!
|
|
(...) Yeah, they were sort of girlie-girl. (...) That doesn't make them *look* better. Those faces are just weird. I think they're getting better, but they have a blank, staring quality. Oh, well. They're head-and-shoulders above Playmobil. In both (...) (25 years ago, 18-Jan-00, to lugnet.belville, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: lugnet.belville has gotten on its feet!
|
|
John Neal <johnneal@uswest.net> wrote in message news:3883D7B5.13F60B...est.net... (...) Belville (...) BV (...) respect to (...) What better is inserting a Belville adult female head on top of a technic guy body. Looks very nice. I have "Princess" (...) (25 years ago, 18-Jan-00, to lugnet.belville, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: lugnet.belville has gotten on its feet!
|
|
I'll admit I am a Belville and Scala fan, although I *do* have the safety net of saying that I'm buying them for my 12 yo daughter...;-) But seriously, I like the BV figs for this reason-- the BV youth are just about the correct size for G scale (...) (25 years ago, 18-Jan-00, to lugnet.belville, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: lugnet.belville has got on it's feet!
|
|
Suzanne D. Rich wrote in message ... (...) set.. (...) their (...) in (...) which (...) with (...) too (...) to (...) some (...) also (...) He he he... Yea, I've played around a bit with swapping body parts. (...) call (...) Yea, that is a dramatic (...) (25 years ago, 17-Jan-00, to lugnet.belville, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: lugnet.belville has got on it's feet!
|
|
(...) [...] Woo! I was waiting for a post like this. I noticed the activity level too. Speaking to those who don't like BV, I'll admit -- when I first saw a BV set.. long ago.. I gaged. But after years studying a wide variety of toys for their (...) (25 years ago, 17-Jan-00, to lugnet.belville, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: lugnet.belville has got on it's feet!
|
|
(...) I see what you mean. I hate the prices too, and the scale IS tough to deal with. (...) Yup. And sorrowfully enough, I would do the same thing, and probably so would everybody else. (...) Do you mean the Good Fairy Queen? Or the evil (...) (25 years ago, 16-Jan-00, to lugnet.belville, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: lugnet.belville has got on it's feet!
|
|
(...) This is a good idea, but it's pretty obvious (IMO) that TLG wouldn't do it. Two basic reasons: 1. This would reduce the price of the set for YOU, meaning it will reduce the profit of TLG - you pay less, and (as you said) not too many people (...) (25 years ago, 16-Jan-00, to lugnet.belville, lugnet.general)
|
