 | | New MOC: Falke Raumschloss Dropship —Daniel Sibley
| | | | Good Morning Space! (2 URLs) Pictures> (URL) Pictures with funny stuff> While I crave your approval, I also appreciate your honesty. Please let me know what you think! -Mr. Dan (20 years ago, 2-Oct-04, to lugnet.announce.moc, lugnet.space, FTX)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: New MOC: Falke Raumschloss Dropship —Daniel Rubin
| | | | | | (...) Ok, I have some thoughts on this thing. One, I think the arches are looking good, and it's a good start. I think maybe you should try and organize the blue better, into a more cohesive pattern. I think the landing gear needs to be beefed up, (...) (20 years ago, 3-Oct-04, to lugnet.space, FTX)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | Re: New MOC: Falke Raumschloss Dropship —Daniel Sibley
| | | | | | | (...) Thanks! (...) I agree. I see how this is a problem in some places. (...) The starwars guns were intended as a sort of greeb. Did they come across as armament? (...) I think of this ship sort of like a military greyhound bus...That is, it flies (...) (20 years ago, 3-Oct-04, to lugnet.space, FTX)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | Re: New MOC: Falke Raumschloss Dropship —Paul Baulch
| | | | | (...) Hi Dan, I like the effect of the arches, but for a dropship I think it needs much bigger engines. I reckon some nacelles on each side would look good. Cheers, (URL) Sci-Fi LEGO> (20 years ago, 6-Oct-04, to lugnet.space, FTX)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: New MOC: Falke Raumschloss Dropship —Daniel Sibley
| | | | | (...) Odd that you should mention that, because I forgot to take pictures of the back (oops!). The engines are in fact quite small indeed but none of the pictures show them. Nacelles on the sides does sound like a good idea. Perhaps I shall do an (...) (20 years ago, 7-Oct-04, to lugnet.space, FTX)
| | | | | | |
