 | | Lugnet carrying rec.toys.lego? —
| | | | Todd, Would there be any benefit to have the lugnet server carry traffic for the rec.toys.lego newsgroup? Would there be any detrimental effect, besides the obvious hit to server time? Cheers, - Sproat (26 years ago, 6-Oct-98, to lugnet.announce)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Lugnet carrying rec.toys.lego? —Matthew Miller
| | | | | (...) Which hit would that be? RTL shouldn't add much load. I'd appreciate this too. I've been meaning to set up a caching server which would grab all groups I wanna read, but I've not gotten around to it yet.... and this would save me the trouble. (...) (26 years ago, 7-Oct-98, to lugnet.announce)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Lugnet carrying rec.toys.lego? —Jeremy Sproat
| | | | | (...) I was thinking more of the social impacts. Would this kind of access open some form of abuse (internal or external) which is best kept off of lugnet? Cheers, - Sproat (26 years ago, 8-Oct-98, to lugnet.announce)
| | | | | | |
