Subject:
|
Re: Lugnet carrying rec.toys.lego?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.announce
|
Date:
|
Wed, 7 Oct 1998 02:06:50 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
mattdm@[StopSpam]mattdm.org
|
Viewed:
|
1860 times
|
| |
|
|
Sproaticus <jsproat@geocities.com> wrote:
> Would there be any detrimental effect, besides the obvious hit to server
> time?
Which hit would that be? RTL shouldn't add much load.
I'd appreciate this too. I've been meaning to set up a caching server which
would grab all groups I wanna read, but I've not gotten around to it
yet.... and this would save me the trouble. (Let someone else do the work,
that's what I always say. *Grin*)
--
Matthew Miller ---> mattdm@mattdm.org
Quotes 'R' Us ---> http://quotes-r-us.org/
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Lugnet carrying rec.toys.lego?
|
| (...) I was thinking more of the social impacts. Would this kind of access open some form of abuse (internal or external) which is best kept off of lugnet? Cheers, - Sproat (26 years ago, 8-Oct-98, to lugnet.announce)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Lugnet carrying rec.toys.lego?
|
| Todd, Would there be any benefit to have the lugnet server carry traffic for the rec.toys.lego newsgroup? Would there be any detrimental effect, besides the obvious hit to server time? Cheers, - Sproat (26 years ago, 6-Oct-98, to lugnet.announce)
|
3 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
