Animation : 639


Animation / 639	638 \| 640

Subject:	8002 destroyer driod animated (partially)
Newsgroups:	lugnet.cad, lugnet.animation, lugnet.technic
Date:	Tue, 10 Feb 2004 22:51:51 GMT
Highlighted:	(details)
Viewed:	145 times

Finished the first phase of this animation. Takes a while to get the timing right. I am going to have it roll toward the screen and transform.. Maybe next week.

http://www.brickshelf.com/cgi-bin/gallery.cgi?i=653660

I dont have this set so I had to try to figure out how it worked from the instructions. I think the model would be more snappy.

Enjoy.

Steve

Message has 5 Replies:

		Re: 8002 destroyer driod animated (partially)
(...) Wow, great! How did you do that? Did you make one LDraw model a frame or did you use the built-in animation features of POV? Or any method unknown to me? /Tore (21 years ago, 10-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.animation, lugnet.technic, FTX)

		Re: 8002 destroyer driod animated (partially)
(...) Beautiful. What's even more impressive is you telling us you don't even have the set! I have a hard time figuring out the mechanism by looking at the thing, imagine doing it just by looking at the instructions. This is the best star wars (...) (21 years ago, 11-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.animation, lugnet.technic, lugnet.starwars, FTX)

		Re: 8002 destroyer driod animated (partially)
(...) Great stuff! Are you using the (URL) Sim-POV mechanics simulation system> integrated in (URL) Megapov>? (21 years ago, 11-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.animation, lugnet.technic, FTX)

		Re: 8002 destroyer driod animated (partially)
(...) I can't believe you did this without having the physical model. I have the set, and from what I can recall, you've done very well in animating its true (theoretical) movements. The real thing is quite snappy, or not. Sometimes the thing would (...) (21 years ago, 11-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.animation, lugnet.technic)

		Re: 8002 destroyer driod animated (partially)
(...) You obviously got it all wrong. I see how it's hard to understand it from the instructions, but the head is supposed to fly off and remain suspended only by the rubber band. ... :-) Sorry, I couldn't resist. :) Very nice work! - David (21 years ago, 11-Feb-04, to lugnet.technic)

26 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact

Custom Search