Subject:
|
Re: Your Thoughts on the LEGO Ambassadors Program
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.ambassadors
|
Date:
|
Fri, 16 Mar 2007 21:39:58 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
7951 times
|
| |
|
|
> For example, Ambassadors lobbied (successfully) to be able to make some
> "official" announcements (or pre-announcements, if you will) like when a
> newer
> version of LDD would be released. But I think that was the exception to
> the
> rule, and I haven't seen much in the way of Ambassadors bringing stuff
> back out
> of the process. I know a lot of it can't always be divulged (heck, I still
> know
> of stuff that hasn't been released, more than a year after leaving the
> program),
> but something is better than nothing.
As I think we all have noticed on the retail shelves, TLC has its
competitors, who make similar but cheaper products. One presumes TLC are not
keen to do anything to give their competitors a heads-up on their plans. And
"pre-announced by ambassadors to the AFOL community" is public knowledge.
I suspect that newer versions of LDD can be an exception precisely because
the competitors aren't in that space (yet).
Kerry
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Your Thoughts on the LEGO Ambassadors Program
|
| What do you think the LEGO Ambassador program is about? I think it's about getting fan input from the LEGO community to appropriate places within the LEGO Group. Specifically, I think it's a "pull" process where TLG requests info from Ambassadors (...) (18 years ago, 15-Mar-07, to lugnet.ambassadors, FTX)
|
13 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
