 | | Re: Your Thoughts on Image Hosting Sites...
|
|
(...) I believe that MOCpages can't yet host certain LEGO-related non-image type files that BS presently hosts. Fortunately with this nice discussion here Sean should have a good idea of what people would like to be able to host there. (...) Does (...) (17 years ago, 7-Aug-07, to lugnet.ambassadors, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Your Thoughts on Image Hosting Sites...
|
|
(...) I'm not sure what you mean by "full Lego related hosting solutions", but Mocpages springs to mind as one that probably comes close. (...) Who knows? He hasn't asked me yet, if that's what you mean. (17 years ago, 7-Aug-07, to lugnet.ambassadors, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Your Thoughts on Image Hosting Sites...
|
|
(...) There's not many things that actually deserve answers, and they usually involve public funds of some kind. (...) I can think of none that offer full Lego related hosting solutions. Most tend to be file dumps or image galleries but not both. If (...) (17 years ago, 7-Aug-07, to lugnet.ambassadors, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Your Thoughts on Image Hosting Sites...
|
|
(...) Not really. Not any more important than the original question at least, and no less deserving of an answer. (...) There's a plethora of alternative solutions out there already. Take your pick. (...) I would've thought that particular task (...) (17 years ago, 6-Aug-07, to lugnet.ambassadors, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Your Thoughts on Image Hosting Sites...
|
|
What's really being asked, I think, is more than just image hosting. That's a cheap commodity through various services. If it was just about putting images on the web, that problem's been solved. But it's more than that. I think at least three (...) (17 years ago, 6-Aug-07, to lugnet.ambassadors, FTX) !
|
| |
| | Re: Your Thoughts on Image Hosting Sites...
|
|
(...) At present is that really that important? At least with a collected list of suggestions it means that an alternate solution has somewhere to find ideas. I think you made it clear you weren't happy paying (what was asked) for BS in its current (...) (17 years ago, 6-Aug-07, to lugnet.ambassadors, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Your Thoughts on Image Hosting Sites...
|
|
(...) So what do you, as LEGO Ambassadors, propose to do? (17 years ago, 6-Aug-07, to lugnet.ambassadors, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Your Thoughts on Image Hosting Sites...
|
|
I'd like to see: 1. Not only the ability to tag photos with a pre-selected list of keywords (as BrickShelf does) but see only folders/photos tagged with those words (like MOCPages). Also filtering by filetype. If I don't use LDraw (for instance), I (...) (17 years ago, 5-Aug-07, to lugnet.ambassadors, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Your Thoughts on Image Hosting Sites...
|
|
(...) I just want Brickshelf to survive, that's all. If Brickshelf can be improved with more features, great. If Brickshelf needs to charge fees, fine. But for me, I don't want another Johnny-come-lately, just what has worked in the past and will (...) (17 years ago, 5-Aug-07, to lugnet.ambassadors, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Your Thoughts on Image Hosting Sites...
|
|
(...) I agree with most of the comments others have written. I would also like to add that I like the way Brickshelf allows you to see a lot of images on the same page – without excessive scrolling. When I'm browsing, I can see 30 images on the same (...) (17 years ago, 5-Aug-07, to lugnet.ambassadors, FTX)
|
