Subject:
|
Re: MOC: Spirit of St. Louis
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.adventurers
|
Date:
|
Mon, 2 Feb 2004 03:53:52 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
3049 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.adventurers, David Laswell wrote:
(snip)
Thanks for the better references, usually Google is so good that it's not worth
the bother trying anyone else. This wasn't one of those times or else I wasn't
using good terms.
> One important note on pitot tubes is that they don't indicate your true speed in
> relation to the ground,
Right, that's why I said "airspeed", not groundspeed. The implication seemed
clear enough to me that I didn't see the need to explain it.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: MOC: Spirit of St. Louis
|
| Thanks for the info guys. I am on a break at work right now so I will get the details later. However, that is what I like about realistic MOCs, the details. I never appreciated how challenging Lindbergh's flight was until I saw a screenshot of the (...) (21 years ago, 2-Feb-04, to lugnet.adventurers)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: MOC: Spirit of St. Louis
|
| (...) Yahoo spits up three right at the top. They have varying degrees of technospeak, so I'm posting all three: (URL) course, the go-to website on how stuff works is, of course, www.howstuffworks.com: (URL) may not always have the best description (...) (21 years ago, 1-Feb-04, to lugnet.adventurers)
|
5 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
