 | | Re: Toward LUGNET equality
|
|
(...) That is a very legitimate complaint, and for that I am sorry. I will be more attentive to this in the future. (...) Thanks for the suggestion. I had thought that my original topics were focused enough, but as is often the case the subsequent (...) (26 years ago, 4-Nov-99, to lugnet.adventurers, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Toward LUGNET equality
|
|
(...) I think perhaps you've gotten the wrong impression! Everything you've been mentioning can (and should!) be posted to LUGNET, it's just a matter of posting it to the right place... Part of the reason that LUGNET exists is to allow people to (...) (26 years ago, 4-Nov-99, to lugnet.adventurers)
|
| |
| | Re: Toward LUGNET equality
|
|
In lugnet.adventurers, Mark Lindsey writes: <snip well thought out commentary> Mark, I don't think most people have a big problem with the topics you've been discussing. I think people have had a problem with >where< you've been discussing them. As (...) (26 years ago, 4-Nov-99, to lugnet.adventurers, lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Toward LUGNET equality
|
|
(...) stay focused, as hard as it sometimes is. If I sometimes go off on a tangent (as I sometimes do), I always try to remember to relate the topic to LEGO before finishing the post. If I can't relate it to anything in LEGO, then I shouldn't be (...) (26 years ago, 4-Nov-99, to lugnet.adventurers, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Toward LUGNET equality
|
|
(...) Hi Mark, I was watching that Adventurers movie thread in .General myself with some irritation, since I am not interested in it at all and it really didn't belong there. The thing about Lugnet is not that it excludes certain types of (...) (26 years ago, 4-Nov-99, to lugnet.adventurers, lugnet.general)
|
