 | | Re: Toward LUGNET equality
|
|
(...) That is a very legitimate complaint, and for that I am sorry. I will be more attentive to this in the future. (...) Thanks for the suggestion. I had thought that my original topics were focused enough, but as is often the case the subsequent (...) (26 years ago, 4-Nov-99, to lugnet.adventurers, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Toward LUGNET equality
|
|
(...) I think perhaps you've gotten the wrong impression! Everything you've been mentioning can (and should!) be posted to LUGNET, it's just a matter of posting it to the right place... Part of the reason that LUGNET exists is to allow people to (...) (26 years ago, 4-Nov-99, to lugnet.adventurers)
|
| |
| | Re: Toward LUGNET equality
|
|
In lugnet.adventurers, Mark Lindsey writes: <snip well thought out commentary> Mark, I don't think most people have a big problem with the topics you've been discussing. I think people have had a problem with >where< you've been discussing them. As (...) (26 years ago, 4-Nov-99, to lugnet.adventurers, lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Toward LUGNET equality
|
|
(...) stay focused, as hard as it sometimes is. If I sometimes go off on a tangent (as I sometimes do), I always try to remember to relate the topic to LEGO before finishing the post. If I can't relate it to anything in LEGO, then I shouldn't be (...) (26 years ago, 4-Nov-99, to lugnet.adventurers, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Toward LUGNET equality
|
|
(...) Hi Mark, I was watching that Adventurers movie thread in .General myself with some irritation, since I am not interested in it at all and it really didn't belong there. The thing about Lugnet is not that it excludes certain types of (...) (26 years ago, 4-Nov-99, to lugnet.adventurers, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Toward LUGNET equality
|
|
Adventurers, Some here at LUGNET are not too happy with postings put in this group recently. That is unfortunate. A few individuals have deemed that all of us are not discussing things 100% lego at all times. Should I be searching for another forum (...) (26 years ago, 4-Nov-99, to lugnet.adventurers, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | DATventures
|
|
Well, I suggested as a possibility for fellow adventurers that someone might want to do an adventures themed datsville, so to speak... You'd have to pick the theme, etc., but it might be fun! If you don't know what Datsville is, check out: (URL) (...) (26 years ago, 3-Nov-99, to lugnet.adventurers)
|
| |
| | Re: The Greatest Adventure Movies List
|
|
(...) I must agree... actually, I think it belongs more in off-topic.fun, but certainly not in lugnet.general... I'm purposely putting this in lugnet.adventures because I responded with a note about this earlier, but since it didn't go to (...) (26 years ago, 3-Nov-99, to lugnet.adventurers)
|
| |
| | Re: The Greatest Adventure Movies List
|
|
I hate to sound snooty, but could this be kept to lugnet.adventurers (I'm not sure it even belongs there instead of in lugnet.off-topic.fun, but at least it's related to the topic)? followups to lugnet.admin.general (26 years ago, 3-Nov-99, to lugnet.adventurers, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: 4x2ReVu: 5938 Oasis Ambush
|
|
(...) I am all choked up Joseph. My opinion actually counts for something? Thank God for internet LEGO discussion groups! People do listen...now if I could get my wife and kids to do the same. Wishful thinking I know. Cheers Joseph, Mark L (26 years ago, 3-Nov-99, to lugnet.adventurers, lugnet.reviews)
|
