 | | Re: LUGNET Posting Policy Update —Marc Nelson, Jr.
|
| | | (...) What part of the TOU is ambiguous? It says "It is a condition of your use of the discussion groups that you do not: (X)" - meaning that if you do X then you may not be allowed to use the discussion groups. Are there any other parts of the TOU (...) (19 years ago, 29-Dec-04, to lugnet.admin.terms, FTX)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: LUGNET Posting Policy Update —David Eaton
|
| | | | | (...) The part that questions whether FTX is allowed specifically. Images, as they appear in FTX are definitely ALLOWED by that rule, because you are not posting a binary image, as the TOU specifically indicates not to do, you are posting a URL to (...) (19 years ago, 29-Dec-04, to lugnet.admin.terms)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: LUGNET Posting Policy Update —David Koudys
|
| | | | | In lugnet.admin.terms, Marc Nelson, Jr. wrote: <snip> (...) In situations such as these, I often consult 'the oracle'... Judge Payton: "Judges are bound to interpret the Constitution within the strict parameters of the text itself. The Constitution (...) (19 years ago, 29-Dec-04, to lugnet.admin.terms)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | (canceled) — Kelly McKiernan
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: LUGNET Posting Policy Update — Kelly McKiernan
|
| | | | Repost with updated formatting to avoid FTX display bug, ironically enough... (...) Hello Marc, The perceived absence of clear guidelines, and lack of consequences for poor behavior, have already had a chilling effect on LUGNET discussion. That's (...) (19 years ago, 29-Dec-04, to lugnet.admin.terms, FTX)
|
| | | | |
