| |
In lugnet.admin.suggestions, Edward Welsh wrote:
> I've been kicking an idea around for a while, and I wanted to put it out to the
> community: I'd like to start an organization for lesbian, gay, bisexual, and
> transgendered (LGBT) AFOLs. A lavender brick society, if you like. It's seemed
> to me that "family" participation at fests and suchlike has been very sparse,
> and I'm wondering if it isn't the classic invisibility thing. Wouldn't it be
> cool if we all wore a little pink brick (or better yet, a lavender brick) on our
> fest nametag, as a subtle little "Yoo hoo, Miss Tallulah!" to those in the know?
> Call me an old-fashioned activist bitch, but it sure would make me feel a little
> more welcome in the community. Not that I feel particularly unwelcome--but I
> have felt a certain disconnect from time to time. A bit of visibility and
> awareness would go a long way in my book.
>
> In the larger scheme, I want to open a conversation about what it means to be
> queer in this community, but I'm not sure I want to have that conversation in a
> general forum. I'd rather participants opt into the conversation.
>
> To the administrators: Could we set up an LGBT AFOL newsgroup, perhaps in
> .people? I'd be happy to administer it. I don't imagine it would be
> particularly high-traffic, but it would provide a safe space in which to discuss
> issues I (and I suspect others) find interesting and important.
>
> Thoughts that pop into my mind: Has anyone used bricks to make a same-sex
> couple wedding topper? We could post "sodomy alerts" whenever Rev. Brendan
> finishes another Bible story touching on queer issues. Don't even get me
> started on gender representation in our hobby. But many of us create
> representations of entire societies, entire worlds. How do we populate these
> worlds? Which stories do we tell? This seems like rich fodder for all sorts of
> analysis. And look at other geek cultures. Pick any sci-fi or fantasy
> universe. All participants subscribe to the same rules--or at least they say
> they do--with expected (and unexpected) comformity (specifically,
> heteronormativity), as well as noncomformity. We don't have the same
> restrictions. The creative aspect of our hobby puts me more in mind of a
> communtiy of artists or writers. But they seem more serious, less spontaneous,
> less likely to graffito a men's room wall. The search for meaning in a
> community is one of the Big Questions.
>
> A few thoughts, anyway, that I'd love to pursue further. Interest?
> Administrative support?
>
>
> -Teddy
Personally I don't see the reason to start labelling people into groups such as
this, I can't see why just everyone regardless of who they are, where they are
from and what they look like can't just do the same as everyone else, why does
anyone need any kind of sub group? That's like pushing a bunch of certain types
and putting them to one side... don't they want to be included along with
everyone else? How about a T-shirt that says "What type of human are you?" and
on the back "I'm a Lavender Brickette"
Makes no sense to me... if anyone wants attention, tell them to stand on a soap
box upside down in the middle of a busy mall... that might do it.
Mel
P.S. I thought everyone here was welcome...
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Lavender Brick Society
|
| I've been kicking an idea around for a while, and I wanted to put it out to the community: I'd like to start an organization for lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgendered (LGBT) AFOLs. A lavender brick society, if you like. It's seemed to me that (...) (20 years ago, 14-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, lugnet.fun.community, lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.people, lugnet.org) !!
|
207 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
