Subject:
|
Re: Can we have a more robust Skip-Filter?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.suggestions
|
Date:
|
Wed, 15 May 2002 15:21:18 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
859 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.suggestions, Ben Roller writes:
> I know this is more of a Todd-era request since I'm not sure how much of
> this type of coding is still occuring, but I thought I'd bring it up for
> comment. Can anyone see any problems that would occur with these types of
> skipping?
I just looked at the code, most of it doesn't seem too hard to do - the
Filter-by-author seems really easy, actually, as long as we keep it in a
cookie, like the filter-by-group... filtering by thread might require
another database (since it has to be able to remember a lot of threads,
forever)... and I like the idea of filtering by size, though I'll have to
dig in some more to see how that might be doable.
so yah, I don't see a problem with it, and wouldn't mind writing it - just
need the time :)
Dan
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Can we have a more robust Skip-Filter?
|
| Right now I can use the skip-filter to get rid of groups I don't like (in my case it's mostly the non-English speaking .loc groups) from my listings. It would be nice to have a more robust skip-filter with the following included: 1. Skip by Author. (...) (23 years ago, 15-May-02, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
3 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
