Subject:
|
Re: set lists (which do i have ?)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.suggestions
|
Date:
|
Wed, 1 May 2002 03:59:43 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
988 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.suggestions, Ronan Webb writes:
> Thanks for your interest ...
> I think Thomas Garrison gets my drift.
> At the risk of repating myself, I want to see what I have in a compact list
> IN THE CONTEXT OF ALL SETS i.e. presented as say a table, which the text and
> thumbnail lists do nicely, but WITHOUT the relevant information; and which a
> "Full" list provides fully but in a cumbersome format.
Yes, I see what you mean now. It would certainly save time & bandwidth over the
full list, and be easier to read. Were you thinking display-only, or have the
ability to update your info on that screen too?
ROSCO
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: set lists (which do i have ?)
|
| Thanks for your interest ... I think Thomas Garrison gets my drift. At the risk of repating myself, I want to see what I have in a compact list IN THE CONTEXT OF ALL SETS i.e. presented as say a table, which the text and thumbnail lists do nicely, (...) (23 years ago, 30-Apr-02, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
10 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
