 | | Re: Request for .vignette group —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | (...) Note, this is my personal thinking, not official policy! I'm not sure that we ought to create a new group for every "fad" building style that comes along unless it has legs. Vignettes are very neat, I agree, but I'm not sure they have (...) (20 years ago, 21-Oct-04, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Request for .vignette group —Nelson Yrizarry
|
| | | | | (...) Sorry - I meant to say .build.vignette (Thanks, ROSCO!), but it was late when I did my initial post. My thoughts on this was to have a place to group/view MOCs of the small scale. There are newsgroups more suited for 'large-scale' MOCs: such (...) (20 years ago, 21-Oct-04, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, FTX)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Request for .vignette group —Thomas Garrison
|
| | | | | | (...) But that's fine, because people who don't read .aquazone (and do read LUGNET) are rational actors who act as they do because they *don't care* about Aquazone. They have chosen which MOCs they consider worthy of their interest by their (...) (20 years ago, 22-Oct-04, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Request for .vignette group —Richie Dulin
|
| | | | (...) Ahhh... That explains why mecha got a group! ;-) Cheers Richie Dulin (20 years ago, 22-Oct-04, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
| | | | |
