 | | Re: New homepage for LUGNET part 3
|
|
(...) It's a good question, Brendan. It's been 8 years and I can't recall exactly what the decision process was, but I do recall we felt that certain orientations looked upside down, while others looked right-side up. I think we looked at 12 (...) (19 years ago, 17-Dec-06, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: New homepage for LUGNET part 3
|
|
Sorry, the link to the full size image did not seem to work. Here's the link again: (URL) -Brendan (19 years ago, 17-Dec-06, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: New homepage for LUGNET part 3
|
|
Hi, Rene. I put together a mock-up image of my suggestions for tweaks to the new LUGNET front page. I am using (URL) index-test-2> as a basis since I prefer the overall look of that draft to any of the ones since then. (Not that the (URL) latest (...) (19 years ago, 17-Dec-06, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: New homepage for LUGNET part 3
|
|
(...) ondrew (19 years ago, 17-Dec-06, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: New homepage for LUGNET part 3
|
|
(...) Rene- The latest draft seems "broken" viewed with Mozilla Firefox 1.5.0.8. Specifically, the picure for the SCLTC story (gee, that's a coincidence!) continuously appears and pierces through the black border on the bottom of the SCLTC story (...) (19 years ago, 16-Dec-06, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, FTX)
|
