 | | Suggest scale modeling newsgroup
|
|
Are there any feelings about whether there would be enough interest in a new newsgroup for discussion about scale modeling of real objects? I don't know where this would fit best in the newsgroup heirarchy; I leave that to the experts. I could see (...) (21 years ago, 26-Sep-05, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
| |
| | Request for LEGO Digital Designer Newsgroup
|
|
I would like to request a new LEGO Digital Designer Newsgroup; a subgroup of lugnet.cad ----> to be ----> lugnet.cad.ldd . Please. Thanks. Eric Sophie LEGO Digital Designer user (21 years ago, 25-Aug-05, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.admin.suggestions) !
|
| |
| | Re: LEGO Factory slipped a bit?
|
|
(...) snip (...) Seconded and spotlighted. There have been a lot of LEGO Factory postings in .cad, but since discussion of LEGO Factory could encompass .cad, .lego and various .market topics, I think it deserves its own newsgroup. Marc Nelson Jr. (...) (21 years ago, 25-Aug-05, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.suggestions, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: suggest a "Factory" group
|
|
(...) I second this suggestion. The discussion is only going to become more frequent as more factory features are released. Tim (21 years ago, 17-Aug-05, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, FTX)
|
| |
| | suggest a "Factory" group
|
|
There's already a lot of talk about LEGO Factory, scattered throughout the LUGNET hierarchy. I suggest a new group, probably at the root level (i.e. lugnet.factory). Best, Joe (21 years ago, 17-Aug-05, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Group needed for BrickWiki?
|
|
(...) I'm interested in how the Wiki and LUGNET can work together. more later. -Suz (21 years ago, 18-Jul-05, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
| |
| | Re: Group needed for BrickWiki?
|
|
In lugnet.admin.suggestions, Ross Crawford wrote: A wiki logically does not need a group for discussion as a wiki can handle it itself...but yes a lugnet group for BrickWiki may be useful (who say I'm logical ?). (...) good Didier (21 years ago, 18-Jul-05, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
| |
| | Group needed for BrickWiki?
|
|
Maybe under lugnet.publish? ROSCO (21 years ago, 18-Jul-05, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
| |
| | Re: Non-numbered sets in the database (Re: Book Reviews, feedback)
|
|
(...) Yes Dave is right. Dave and Eric Strand have been digging up lots of obscure Samsonite sets that were sold by department stores. As an example a 1969 Sears catalog shows set #49-C-4418, which is a 335 piece basic set. Not exactly a user (...) (21 years ago, 22-Jun-05, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
| |
| | Re: Non-numbered sets in the database (Re: Book Reviews, feedback)
|
|
(...) I would also like to see non-numbered 'official' sets in the database. Your example included the Weetabix sets, but there are other promo sets not in the DB. Life Puppet, for instance. Also, there are the sets sold through department stores, (...) (21 years ago, 20-Jun-05, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
