 | | Re: Group needed for BrickWiki?
|
|
(...) I'm interested in how the Wiki and LUGNET can work together. more later. -Suz (21 years ago, 18-Jul-05, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
| |
| | Re: Group needed for BrickWiki?
|
|
In lugnet.admin.suggestions, Ross Crawford wrote: A wiki logically does not need a group for discussion as a wiki can handle it itself...but yes a lugnet group for BrickWiki may be useful (who say I'm logical ?). (...) good Didier (21 years ago, 18-Jul-05, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
| |
| | Group needed for BrickWiki?
|
|
Maybe under lugnet.publish? ROSCO (21 years ago, 18-Jul-05, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
| |
| | Re: Non-numbered sets in the database (Re: Book Reviews, feedback)
|
|
(...) Yes Dave is right. Dave and Eric Strand have been digging up lots of obscure Samsonite sets that were sold by department stores. As an example a 1969 Sears catalog shows set #49-C-4418, which is a 335 piece basic set. Not exactly a user (...) (21 years ago, 22-Jun-05, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
| |
| | Re: Non-numbered sets in the database (Re: Book Reviews, feedback)
|
|
(...) I would also like to see non-numbered 'official' sets in the database. Your example included the Weetabix sets, but there are other promo sets not in the DB. Life Puppet, for instance. Also, there are the sets sold through department stores, (...) (21 years ago, 20-Jun-05, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
| |
| | Re: Non-numbered sets in the database (Re: Book Reviews, feedback)
|
|
(...) I agree Jojo, There are a few regular Lego sets that have rather strange numbers. The (Denmark Only) education sets of the 1960's are an example. You have "Terapi" sets "I", "II" and "III", and "S/8" sets and "K/12" sets. Gary Istok (21 years ago, 18-Jun-05, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
| |
| | Non-numbered sets in the database (Re: Book Reviews, feedback)
|
|
Hello! Sorry for revitalising an aged thread... (...) The main problem with the database probably is its strict limitation to numbers. While I like set numbers and actually prefer them over set names (because numbers are universal while names differ (...) (21 years ago, 18-Jun-05, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, lugnet.admin.database, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Please consider fixing FTX...
|
|
Hmm, it seems more and more folks are creating FTX posts with FTX hard new lines without a real new line. If these are being created in the web editor, could it reasonably force a real new line? It's slowly getting to the point that NNTP access to (...) (21 years ago, 6-Jun-05, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
| |
| | Re: Please consider fixing FTX...
|
|
(...) Like I said, I'm not playing to the cheap seats. Newsreaders Be Darned! Honestly, it never even occurred to me. I've accessed LUGNET via the web ever since I started reading it, and the foibles of the newsreader interface have been, at best, (...) (21 years ago, 1-Jun-05, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Please consider fixing FTX...
|
|
(...) Out of curiosity, when you wrote the post, how did you add in the newlines? That is, when I'm writing a post in FTX, I almost NEVER use the character for newlines. Instead, I forget. This causes problems like this: Pieces That Are Awesome: - (...) (21 years ago, 31-May-05, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, FTX)
|
