|
|
 | | Re: List of suggestions
|
| (...) What I meant was that Admins should give preference to explaining something rather than 'keeping it a secret' if you will, but whether or not they actually should tell something should be left up to them, especially if it involves a sensitive (...) (21 years ago, 30-Mar-05, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, FTX)
| | | | | Re: List of suggestions
|
| (...) Wow! All nicely footnoted and everything! Well OK I probably expected the footnotes... Thanks ROSCO (21 years ago, 30-Mar-05, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
| | | | | Re: List of suggestions
|
| (...) OK. (...) Done, I think. Take a boo at the key now and LMK what you think. (21 years ago, 30-Mar-05, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
| | | | | Re: Request to move .mecha
|
| (...) NOOOO! It will then show up whenever you browse Space. For people who don't care about Mecha but do care about Space, it makes the Web interface less useful. It's bad enough that many of the .mecha posters crosspost everything to .space as it (...) (21 years ago, 30-Mar-05, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
| | | | | Re: HTML conversion for email subscribers.
|
| (...) How about if the FTX-to-HTML filter is run at the time of posting, rather than at the time of rendering, and it could be stored on the NNTP server as a multipart/alternative with 3 parts: FTX, HTML, and a plain-text version (generated from the (...) (21 years ago, 30-Mar-05, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, FTX)
| | | | | Suggestion - locate my recent posts and/or replies to same
|
| I don't have much time for LUGNET any more, so every once in a while I surf over to the Web interface and browse a few threads - generally ones that were in the top 10 list on the home page, or maybe delve into a couple of particular groups. In (...) (21 years ago, 30-Mar-05, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
| | | | | Re: List of suggestions
|
| (...) No, it (technically) wasn't an official post since it wasn't officially signed. But since the list is modifying content in the admin area, the list is official, as far as it goes, it's officially the best list we have, until it's improved, at (...) (21 years ago, 30-Mar-05, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.suggestions)
| | | | | Re: List of suggestions
|
| (...) Yes, I think probably a key would be useful, even if the (??) don't remain so for long (which I expect they won't). (...) OK, I just thought "Rejected (??)" gives the average user no more information than "Open", really, and just tends to add (...) (21 years ago, 30-Mar-05, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
| | | | | Re: List of suggestions
|
| (...) It means I think (unofficially) that is the status, but I'm not sure and it's a placeholder pending clarification from the implementation team. That seemed clear to me at the time, was it not what you thought it meant? I can add a Status Key, (...) (21 years ago, 30-Mar-05, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
| | | | | Re: List of suggestions
|
| (...) -snip- (...) "At their own discretion" ... wouldn't that also mean that Admins shouldn't be obligated? I'm a bit confused. Perhaps a good compromise would be, Admins are obligated to give a reason, but that reason need not be detailed. A (...) (21 years ago, 30-Mar-05, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, FTX)
|
|
