| | Re: Top 1000 noisemakers (was: Re: Posting frequency?)
|
|
"Dan Boger" <dan@peeron.com> wrote in message news:GpBx9D.CMy@lugnet.com... (...) yesterday... (...) <snip> (...) <snip> (...) <snip> In a way this is kinda deceptive because I used Ken's name for a bit after he died untill I was able to get mine (...) (23 years ago, 3-Jan-02, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
|
| | Re: Top 1000 noisemakers (was: Re: Posting frequency?)
|
|
(...) Rather Scary. 20 people post over a fifth of the messages here. :-o Scott A (23 years ago, 3-Jan-02, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
|
| | Re: Top 1000 noisemakers (was: Re: Posting frequency?)
|
|
(...) It would be interesting to update last years list, so a comparision between now and last year can be made. -- Terry K -- (23 years ago, 3-Jan-02, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
|
| | Re: Top 1000 noisemakers (was: Re: Posting frequency?)
|
|
(...) If I was a .cad I wouldn't want an analysis of it either. ;-) -- Terry K -- (23 years ago, 3-Jan-02, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
|
| | Re: Top 1000 noisemakers (was: Re: Posting frequency?)
|
|
(...) Ouch. I guess that's the result of keeping quiet and laying low for such a long time. So... Hi Frank, nice to meet'cha! I've been around for a pretty long time, though at present I'm going through a bit of a "dim age". Not dark, but not very (...) (23 years ago, 3-Jan-02, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
|
| | Re: Top 1000 noisemakers (was: Re: Posting frequency?)
|
|
(...) yesterday... (...) Thanks Dan! (23 years ago, 3-Jan-02, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
|
| | Re: Top 1000 noisemakers (was: Re: Posting frequency?)
|
|
(...) Todd's list last year was a list for all posts since September 1998, IIRC. I may be slacking, but there's no way I posted half as much this year as last. But I think you're right in that some of the "newness" has faded. As far as MOC's are (...) (23 years ago, 2-Jan-02, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
|
| | Re: Top 1000 noisemakers (was: Re: Posting frequency?)
|
|
(...) Most likely it's due to the new posting verification rules. It's been discussed that overall posting is significantly down since the email verification kicked in. Adrian (23 years ago, 2-Jan-02, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
|
| | Re: Top 1000 noisemakers (was: Re: Posting frequency?)
|
|
(...) 8th place!?!?! Oh holy cripes...Jill's gonna' kill me! I really had NO idea I posted here quite this often...I assume that this list isn't filtered for crossposts, right? So there's a CHANCE that I'm at least out of the top ten? GEEZ! Matt (...) (23 years ago, 2-Jan-02, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
|
| | Re: Top 1000 noisemakers (was: Re: Posting frequency?)
|
|
(...) Hmmm ... last year we had 31 people with over a thousand posts, and this year only 9. Plus the overall number has gone down - any ideas what this is attributed to? The newness of Lugnet wearing off? I wonder if the hits are higher than last (...) (23 years ago, 2-Jan-02, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.nntp)
|