 | | Re: E-Mail Confirmations Working? —Maggie Cambron
|
| | | (...) I didn't get a confirmation email to my test post (interface) just now, but more than that, I haven't received any posts by email from the groups to which I subscribe since sometime yesterday. Should I unsubscribe so I don't get a huge batch (...) (23 years ago, 25-Sep-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: E-Mail Confirmations Working? —James Brown
|
| | | | (...) That would be rather draining. (just trying to help) GDR James (23 years ago, 25-Sep-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: E-Mail Confirmations Working? —James Brown
|
| | | | | In lugnet.admin.nntp, James Brown fogets to post to the right group: (...) (23 years ago, 25-Sep-01, to lugnet.off-topic.pun)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: E-Mail Confirmations Working? —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | (...) I think you need to root out your need to plumb the depths with these puns. Do you think you're the alpha-mail of punning or something? Why sink to this non stainless level? And to the wrong group no less. I'm not your garbage disposal. Stop, (...) (23 years ago, 25-Sep-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp, lugnet.off-topic.pun)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: E-Mail Confirmations Working? —James Brown
|
| | | | (...) Naw, I'm just the kind of snake that needs to keep plugging away, I never claimed to be some kind of porcelain idol. Your reputation isn't so ivory, either, so pipe down. (...) U-bend too far in using the same pun twice in a post, though. (...) (23 years ago, 25-Sep-01, to lugnet.off-topic.pun)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: E-Mail Confirmations Working? —Maggie Cambron
|
| | | | (...) Ack, it sure didn't take much to flush you guys out! Maggie (23 years ago, 26-Sep-01, to lugnet.off-topic.pun)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: E-Mail Confirmations Working? —Lindsay Frederick Braun
|
| | | | (...) We do try to a-commode-ate. LFB (23 years ago, 26-Sep-01, to lugnet.off-topic.pun)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: E-Mail Confirmations Working? —Dave Low
|
| | | | (...) In my evalvulation, this chain is just getting potty. You've tapped this flow before quite aqueductly, so why faucet? --DaveL (23 years ago, 26-Sep-01, to lugnet.off-topic.pun)
|
| | | | |
