Subject:
|
Re: Newsgroup for LEGO "art" (was: Re: edy lego art)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.nntp
|
Date:
|
Thu, 3 Aug 2000 07:46:03 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
164 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.nntp, Juergen Stuber writes:
> You could put them in as examples, but of course you cannot
> make an exhaustive list of what is art, that's just contrary
> to the nature of art. Maybe the charter should mention that
> the ordinary LEGO model doesn't belong there, as there are
> plenty of groups for that.
Well then how do you define "ordinary"? <gd&r> :)
Ja, I agree though -- that's a good way of putting it, and why I was thinking
a subgroup of .fun rather than .build...
--Todd
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Newsgroup for LEGO "art" (was: Re: edy lego art)
|
| (...) You could put them in as examples, but of course you cannot make an exhaustive list of what is art, that's just contrary to the nature of art. Maybe the charter should mention that the ordinary LEGO model doesn't belong there, as there are (...) (24 years ago, 3-Aug-00, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
2 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
