To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.admin.nntpOpen lugnet.admin.nntp in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Administrative / NNTP / 476
475  |  477
Subject: 
Re: Official vs. unofficial LEGO postings
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.admin.nntp
Date: 
Fri, 16 Mar 2001 16:23:11 GMT
Viewed: 
1778 times
  
In lugnet.admin.nntp, Larry Pieniazek writes:

Not under the new proposed rules, unless you hang it off some unrelated post
by an LD person.

I don't know where you're getting that.

http://news.lugnet.com/admin/nntp/?n=317

Nothing is said about who can start a thread, only who can follow up to a post.

September 28 1998 was the formation date for dear-lego, from the group header.
December 1999 was when Brad showed up (1)

My math gives me 1 year 3 months at MOST, not a couple of years at LEAST.

Oh, dear, I estimated incorrectly.  My point still stands at 1 year 3 months-
the group has nothing to do with expecting a response from LEGO.

You're rationalising. So's Todd. What I don't get, though, is why. What is
this big thing that has made you so anti anything tainted with even the
slightest hint of the notion that people and companies want to sell things?

What in heck are you talking about?

Lugnet is for fans.  Lugnet is not a tool for LEGO.  If LEGO wants to interact
with fans on Lugnet, great!  They can have a whole area unto themselves to do
it.  But to allow them to run rampant throughout Lugnet dilutes the purpose for
which Lugnet was started- fans talking to fans.

I would hope you aren't also making a reference to our recent "flogging"
debate, which has no bearing at all on the present conversation.

eric



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Official vs. unofficial LEGO postings
 
(...) Yes! 100%! What Eric wrote above captures the essence of all of this splendidly. A true voice of reason. I couldn't have said it better myself. Eric gets it. Thank you, Eric! (And Eric Kingsley too, who also gets it and has made many excellent (...) (23 years ago, 16-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Official vs. unofficial LEGO postings
 
(...) Not under the new proposed rules, unless you hang it off some unrelated post by an LD person. (...) September 28 1998 was the formation date for dear-lego, from the group header. December 1999 was when Brad showed up (1) My math gives me 1 (...) (23 years ago, 16-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)

232 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR