Subject:
|
Re: Why these news groups were created
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.nntp
|
Date:
|
Wed, 22 Sep 2004 20:17:55 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
11057 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.nntp, David Koudys wrote:
> In lugnet.admin.nntp, John Neal wrote:
>
> <snip>
>
>
> > Frank, I totally honor and agree with everything you wrote-- we {can't}
> > separate ourselves from ourselves and must be let to be who we are, but we
> > can separate those real discussions that take place from the public. I don't
> > believe that that would compromise them one bit-- in fact, it would greatly
> > [inhance] them IMO! No more tiptoeing around expletives (self-censoring for
> > the sake of TOS); people can truly be and say who and want they want!
> > Wouldn't a freer and more open policy contribute to a more honest
> > relationship among the participating AFOL community?
>
> no more tiptoeing around expeletives? and you want to protect the children from
> .lgbt postings?
>
> Please clarify
I'm talking about making .people groups and other OT groups {private} and only
accessible by 18 yo members.
[JOHN]
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Why these news groups were created
|
| (...) Ahh. That clarifies. That said, I'm 37 and I don't swear. I have seen 13 year olds swear like sailors--Just as there are teenagers who believe that they should have access to .lgbt. Are the teenagers to be excluded? Dave K (22 years ago, 22-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
Message is in Reply To:
151 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
