Subject:
|
Re: LEGOFan.net - central community run hub for all areas of the LEGO community.
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.nntp
|
Date:
|
Fri, 13 Feb 2004 02:36:46 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
(mattdm@mattdm.org)Spamcake()
|
Viewed:
|
3499 times
|
| |
|
|
TWS Garrison <twBASSs@ISmorBESTfydd.net> wrote:
> 1) Some posts may only be read by members of a group---for example, those
> who have e-mailed the curator[1] requesting permission to read private
Wouldn't it be cleaner to do this on a per-group basis, rather than having
a mishmash in one group? There could be lugnet.org.us.nelug and
lugnet.org.us.nelug.private, for example.
> 2) Curator must have a known and previously agreed ability and
> responsibility to cancel posts that should have been private but were not
> (i.e., replies to private posts that include confidential information that
> should have been trimmed from a public reply).
Having the separate private group seems like a cleaner solution here --
just make the message-accepting code reject crossposts to a private group
or followup-to outside of the group.
If someone goes beyond that and purposely reposts out of the group, that
seems beyond reasonable technical messures to prevent.
If it must be on a per-post basis, a similar thing could be done: replies
to a private message would always automatically be private.
> 3) (Some) Newsgroups may only accept posts from those whom the curator has
> specified may post. (I believe that this functionality has already been
This would be a given, of course.
--
Matthew Miller mattdm@mattdm.org <http://www.mattdm.org/>
Boston University Linux ------> <http://linux.bu.edu/>
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
2 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
