Subject:
|
Re: FUT bug?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.nntp
|
Date:
|
Thu, 9 Oct 2003 02:49:54 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
3424 times
|
| |
|
|
On Thu, Oct 09, 2003 at 02:19:48AM +0000, Larry Pieniazek wrote:
> Do we have a small bug here somewhere or was the FUT set wrong to
> start with, or is Dan's mail client BROKEN (grin) or ??
What do you think? :)
for reference, here's the headers of the msg I replied to:
X-Loop: lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto@lugnet.com
X-Message-Archive: http://news.lugnet.com/news/display.cgi?lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto:9525
From: "Larry Pieniazek" <lpieniazek@mercator.com>
X-Real-Life-Name: Larry Pieniazek
Errors-To: news-errors@lugnet.com
To: lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto@lugnet.com, lugnet.off-topic.test.foo@lugnet.com
Reply-To: "Larry Pieniazek" <lpieniazek@mercator.com>
Subject: Re: Best SB Set Names
Posted-Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2003 02:01:46 GMT
Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2003 02:01:46 GMT
Organization: Milton Train Works(tm) - part of Guild of Bricksmiths(tm)
Precedence: list
Note that the Reply-To is set to the poster, which is really what I set
my subscription options to. Not sure how this should be fixed though. I
don't remember if there is a standard for 'list-reply' or somesuch.
--
Dan Boger
dan@peeron.com
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | FUT bug?
|
| See this post: (URL) note where FUT is set. Then see the two posts below it in the thread. One honors the FUT and one (by Dan, who I can't imagine would actually make a mistake) doesn't. Do we have a small bug here somewhere or was the FUT set wrong (...) (21 years ago, 9-Oct-03, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
2 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
