 | | Re: NNTP interface broken? —Carlo Ottolina
|
| | | "Todd Lehman" <todd@lugnet.com> wrote in message news:HFJtGH.44C@lugnet.com... (...) This is the trace of a connection to lugnet.loc.it: ---...--- GROUP lugnet.loc.it 211 13384 1 13101 lugnet.loc.it ---...--- 13384 - 13101 = 283 283 is the number of (...) (21 years ago, 27-May-03, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: NNTP interface broken? — Todd Lehman
|
| | | | (...) What kind of trace is that? It doesn't look like a raw NNTP capture. Anyway, could you try something for me? Of those 283 messages, pick a few and download them, then restart Outlook and see how many it reports. (...) If you happen to know (...) (21 years ago, 27-May-03, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: NNTP interface broken? —Carlo Ottolina
|
| | | | "Todd Lehman" <todd@lugnet.com> wrote in message news:HFK07y.17Mo@lugnet.com... (...) It is just the NNTP part of the packets. I just did a trace with Ethereal, and this is what I get: GROUP lugnet.loc.eu 211 186 1 188 lugnet.loc.eu GROUP (...) (21 years ago, 27-May-03, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: NNTP interface broken? —Carlo Ottolina
|
| | | | | Ok, it seems you just fix it. This is what I get now: GROUP lugnet.loc.it 211 13087 1 13106 lugnet.loc.it "estimated" < "last": OE is fine with it. Thanks. BTW: why is "estimated" <> "last" - "first"? -- Cheers Carlo LugNet #24 (21 years ago, 27-May-03, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: NNTP interface broken? — Todd Lehman
|
| | | | (...) Ah, OK. I get the same thing by telnetting to port 119. Thanks. (...) OK, this group is correct. The last article number is 188, and there are 186 articles present, because 2 in this group were cancelled. (...) OK, this group is incorrect. The (...) (21 years ago, 27-May-03, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| | | | |
