|
|
 | | Re: Followup-To, ex post facto
|
| (...) This is a great addition to the community. It's better than your typical moderation, which kills the discussion entirely. Hopefully people will have an easier time ignoring discussions they don't want to see, because they will be moved to the (...) (22 years ago, 20-Jul-04, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
| | | | | Re: test of FUT override
|
| (...) Hmmmm - shouldn't it be X-Original-Followup-To? Would it send out notifications to test.bar, after the FUT's updated? Or does the post silently appear? Of course, this doesn't affect mail/news readers, but I don't think you can do anything (...) (22 years ago, 20-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.test.bar, lugnet.admin.nntp)
| | | | | Re: Followup-To, ex post facto
|
| (...) <snip> Thanks, Todd, this feature is most welcome. I've found the upswing in FUT "corralling" somewhat off-putting (to the point that I've limited my participation with Lugnet). Now, hopefully we can spend less time talking about meta-data and (...) (22 years ago, 20-Jul-04, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
| | | | | Followup-To, ex post facto
|
| I have implemented a web interface feature which allows an news admin* to apply a slight change to a news article: If for some reason the 'Followup-To' header on a post was set incorrectly, or was left empty when it should have been set, this can (...) (22 years ago, 20-Jul-04, to lugnet.admin.nntp, lugnet.announce) !
| | | | | Re: New newsgroup lugnet.color
|
| (...) Yes. And people complaining about people complaining about people complaining about colors. :) --Todd (22 years ago, 20-Jul-04, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
|
