To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.admin.generalOpen lugnet.admin.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Administrative / General / Search Results: password
 Results 181 – 200 of about 520.
Search took 0.00 CPU seconds. 

Messages:  Full | Brief | Compact
Sort:  Prefer Newer | Prefer Older | Best Match

  Re: Automated password appraisal (Re: New feature: Article rating)
 
(...) OK, try again now. It should dislike the "8-9" part enough to fail it. --Todd (24 years ago, 30-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
 

password
(score: 1.004)

  Re: Automated password appraisal (Re: New feature: Article rating)
 
(...) Not sure how to detect this...it isn't that terrible anyway, is it? (I can see that it comes from "lego*minifig" but it's still probably strong enough?) (...) Now gives a -1030%. (...) Now gives a 200%. If LEGO sets weren't an issue it would (...) (24 years ago, 30-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
 

password
(score: 1.004)

  Re: Automated password appraisal (Re: New feature: Article rating)
 
It really likes: fnark-5- (345%) but hates: fnark-5-lego (-104%) Surely that's squiffy? Or is it based on the theory that being able to guess the 'lego' part will make the 'fnark-5-' more obvious? Richard (24 years ago, 30-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)  
 

password
(score: 1.004)

  Re: Automated password appraisal (Re: New feature: Article rating)
 
(...) You could make it stricter I think, send out an email warning with a code# to the member, and block access until they have replied. You could either use the code# to automate unblocking the account, or as part of a manual check. The code# (...) (24 years ago, 30-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)  
 

password
(score: 1.004)

  Re: Automated password appraisal (Re: New feature: Article rating)
 
(...) It's a side-effect of downrating fluffy portions even though they don't hurt. That is, if you have a wicked strong 8-character pw (call it "X" for short), then even though "Xlego" is no worse than "X", it takes points off for the fluffy part (...) (24 years ago, 30-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)  
 

password
(score: 1.004)

  Re: Automated password appraisal (Re: New feature: Article rating)
 
(...) OK, that helps...that's all I need to know...thanks! (...) Yup! (Although "Lugnet" is a word in Swedish, and it finds this. :) (...) Yup! I don't think I'll lose any sleep over it. --Todd (24 years ago, 30-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)  
 

password
(score: 1.004)

  Re: Automated password appraisal (Re: New feature: Article rating)
 
(...) Formulae: e=mc^2 - Great (266%) E=mc^2 - Excellent (303%) e=m*c^2 - Outstanding (556%) E=m*c^2 - Outstanding (594%) Keyboard runs: zdt7cgu9 - Outstanding (491%) zcbmadgj - Outstanding (462%) zfu0xgi- - Outstanding (529%) Software Titles: (...) (24 years ago, 31-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
 

password
(score: 1.004)

  Re: Automated password appraisal (Re: New feature: Article rating)
 
(...) You might want to add ^ for exponentiation. I just posted a list passwords that passed, including 4 variations of the Theory of Relativity. Rob - Rob Farver - mailto:rfarver@rcn.com (2 URLs) (24 years ago, 31-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)  
 

password
(score: 1.004)

  Re: Automated password appraisal (Re: New feature: Article rating)
 
(...) Ah yes! --Todd (24 years ago, 31-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
 

password
(score: 1.004)

  Re: Automated password appraisal (Re: New feature: Article rating)
 
(...) OK, so work it backwards, IOW. Cool. That sounds doable, and wouldn't even increase the time it took to evaluate pw's by more than the tiniest percent. (...) Well, if the dictionary grows from 2.7 million to 3.5 million entries, that's OK -- (...) (24 years ago, 31-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)  
 

password
(score: 1.004)

  Re: Automated password appraisal (Re: New feature: Article rating)
 
(...) Yum, yum! :-s Well, ya gotta also figure that decreasing the safety margin from 100,000 to 1000 is one thing (bad -- and I don't think that's case here), but decreasing it from, say, eleventeen hundred quintrillion down to fifty-seven (...) (24 years ago, 31-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)  
 

password
(score: 1.004)

  Re: Automated password appraisal (Re: New feature: Article rating)
 
(...) Cool! OK, how about like this: ---...--- QWERTY 0 0 ~!@#$%^&*()_+ 0 0 `1234567890-= 1 1 QWERTYUIOP{}| 1 1 qwertyuiop[]\ 2 1 ASDFGHJKL:" 2 1 asdfghjkl;' 3 1 ZXCVBNM<>? 3 1 zxcvbnm,./ ---...--- TIA! --Todd (24 years ago, 31-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
 

password
(score: 1.004)

  Re: Automated password appraisal (Re: New feature: Article rating)
 
(...) Sure! If it's not the one at Oxford[1] University, pls. send URL! :) --Todd [1] I always think that looks like a hex number :) (24 years ago, 31-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
 

password
(score: 1.004)

  Re: Automated password appraisal (Re: New feature: Article rating)
 
Wow, your wordlists are just nice. They even knows me and my wife..:-) Selçuk (...) (24 years ago, 31-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
 

password
(score: 1.004)

  Re: Automated password appraisal (Re: New feature: Article rating)
 
(...) Cool! And thanks for checking! --Todd (24 years ago, 31-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)  
 

password
(score: 1.004)

  Re: Automated password appraisal (Re: New feature: Article rating)
 
By the way, for the special characters, it knows what "selcuk" is but doesn't know the "selçuk", which is actually the correct form. Do you want any Turkish wordlists? Selçuk (...) (24 years ago, 31-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)  
 

password
(score: 1.004)

  Re: Automated password appraisal (Re: New feature: Article rating)
 
(...) I haven't decoded the ASCII+127 yet on those...sorry. (...) I would love them, if you have any in their native ISO-8859-# encoding. --Todd (24 years ago, 31-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
 

password
(score: 1.004)

  Re: Automated password appraisal (Re: New feature: Article rating)
 
(...) Down the road prolly... Gotta get this cut over ASAP and get the pages stuff finished up... Did it give you enough flexibility that you could find something it liked that you could use? (That's it's only real purpose, even if it happens to be (...) (24 years ago, 1-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
 

password
(score: 1.004)

  Re: Automated password appraisal (Re: New feature: Article rating)
 
(...) Yup -- those are the ones from Oxford! Great lists!!! --Todd (24 years ago, 1-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
 

password
(score: 1.004)

  Re: Automated password appraisal (Re: New feature: Article rating)
 
(...) the ~ key (without pressing Shift) Here are the keyboard rows: 0 1 å/-À¶ØÖ¤µ¨¢ª 0 1 +ñòóôÙßõö÷øù 1 1 æäÓ¾ÐÑÕùºţ 1 1 ð"®±¸íê³Ï­°,¥ 2 1 ¿Ë¡´àéèÒÊǧ 2 1 Ħ¯â¬çëÉÈ«. 3 1 ¼»áÍÔ×·Áã½ 3 1 ()©ÎÚì?²ÌÆ Might want to take that into consideration... (...) (24 years ago, 2-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.general)  
 

password
(score: 1.004)

More:  Next Page >>


©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR