Subject:
|
Re: Automated password appraisal (Re: New feature: Article rating)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Thu, 30 Mar 2000 22:55:53 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
3678 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.general, Steve Bliss writes:
> In lugnet.admin.general, Todd Lehman wrote:
> > Second important question:
> > Are there words that you can think of which this fails to detect as
> > potential weaknesses? (Try to stump it!)
>
> How about some of the following? They seem topically weak to me.
>
> lg*mnfg - 389% excellent
Not sure how to detect this...it isn't that terrible anyway, is it? (I can
see that it comes from "lego*minifig" but it's still probably strong enough?)
> shp@hm8354386 - 236% great
Now gives a -1030%.
> m:trn6989 - 272% great
Now gives a 200%. If LEGO sets weren't an issue it would be a pretty good
one.
--Todd
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
309 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
