Subject:
|
Re: I think we stepped in something.
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Wed, 8 Aug 2001 23:16:48 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
684 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.general, Matthew Gerber writes:
>
> Asking LUGNET admin to police the groups, request "parent-admin
> conferences", or make special symbols/colors/whatever to single people out
> so they get treated differently by the other posters just isn't viable or
> right. How much time would you have Suzanne and Todd take making sure
> everyone is treated according to their current mental state? Look especially
> at Frank's post...the poster and their caretakers are responsible for her
> actions...and that's the way it should be (IMO).
It's this latter example (like Frank's) that I had in mind. Someone
at LUGNET would only need make the initial contact, and the rest
is up to the person's "supervisor". Since I would assume cases
like this to be exceptionally rare, I would imagine that yes it
would be LUGNET admins who would make this contact. Unless there
was another volunteer.
KDJ
_______________________________________
LUGNETer #203, Windsor, Ontario, Canada
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: I think we stepped in something.
|
| (...) Chicken 8?P (Like I'm not doing the same thing? I'll try to form one now, here...) (...) I know...I was just making extreme, general (and well known) cases... Think about this...my 2 year old daughter can PLAY with the computer, but she'll (...) (23 years ago, 8-Aug-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
9 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
