To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.admin.generalOpen lugnet.admin.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Administrative / General / 9160
9159  |  9161
Subject: 
Re: Length of lines
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.admin.general
Date: 
Fri, 4 May 2001 23:53:20 GMT
Viewed: 
143 times
  
I thought 80 was the number.  That was the number when I started using the
internet around 6 years ago.  Has it been revised?

Build On!
John Matthews
____________________________________________________________________________
____
1234567890123456789012345678901234567890123456789012345678901234567890123456
7890


Fredrik Glöckner <fredrik.glockner@bio.uio.no> wrote in message
news:qrd3dalclwh.fsf@eos.uio.no...
I see a lot of posts with long lines.  Typically around 75-80.  The
problem with these is that when people quote them, they become even
longer, and eventually they are broken by some clients.


A common rule on USENET is to keep the line length below 72 when
composing an article.  Now, LUGNET is not USENET, but it uses the same
transfer mechanism (NNTP), and some people use the same kind of
clients to access the posts.


Where do the posts with so long lines come from?  Does the web
interface break lines at 80, for example?  (No, I don't use it.)  If
it does, would it be a good idea to cut this down to 72, so that fewer
posts are generated with long lines, and the problem with broken
quotation is avoided?


Fredrik



Message has 3 Replies:
  Re: Length of lines
 
Heh, guess my reader is set to 76! :) M$ default, I suspect. Build On! John Matthews John Matthews <jmatthew@columbus.rr.com> wrote in message news:GCu517.1Kv@lugnet.com... (...) ___...___ (...) 12345678901234567890...7890123456 (...) (23 years ago, 4-May-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
  Re: Length of lines
 
(...) If it was 80, and most screens were 80x24, as soon as the first quote happened it would wrap wrong. :) 72 has been the de-facto standard for as long as I can remember (i think? was it ever mentioned in an RFC?). (23 years ago, 5-May-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
  Re: Length of lines
 
(...) 80 is the width of the "standard" screen, but messages should be wrapped somewhat before that. (23 years ago, 5-May-01, to lugnet.admin.general)

Message is in Reply To:
  Length of lines
 
I see a lot of posts with long lines. Typically around 75-80. The problem with these is that when people quote them, they become even longer, and eventually they are broken by some clients. A common rule on USENET is to keep the line length below 72 (...) (23 years ago, 4-May-01, to lugnet.admin.general)

7 Messages in This Thread:





Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR