To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.admin.generalOpen lugnet.admin.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Administrative / General / 9160
9159  |  9161
Subject: 
Re: Length of lines
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.admin.general
Date: 
Fri, 4 May 2001 23:53:20 GMT
Viewed: 
2570 times
  
I thought 80 was the number.  That was the number when I started using the
internet around 6 years ago.  Has it been revised?

Build On!
John Matthews
____________________________________________________________________________
____
1234567890123456789012345678901234567890123456789012345678901234567890123456
7890


Fredrik Glöckner <fredrik.glockner@bio.uio.no> wrote in message
news:qrd3dalclwh.fsf@eos.uio.no...
> I see a lot of posts with long lines.  Typically around 75-80.  The
> problem with these is that when people quote them, they become even
> longer, and eventually they are broken by some clients.
> 
> 
> A common rule on USENET is to keep the line length below 72 when
> composing an article.  Now, LUGNET is not USENET, but it uses the same
> transfer mechanism (NNTP), and some people use the same kind of
> clients to access the posts.
> 
> 
> Where do the posts with so long lines come from?  Does the web
> interface break lines at 80, for example?  (No, I don't use it.)  If
> it does, would it be a good idea to cut this down to 72, so that fewer
> posts are generated with long lines, and the problem with broken
> quotation is avoided?
> 
> 
> Fredrik



Message has 3 Replies:
  Re: Length of lines
 
Heh, guess my reader is set to 76! :) M$ default, I suspect. Build On! John Matthews John Matthews <jmatthew@columbus.rr.com> wrote in message news:GCu517.1Kv@lugnet.com... (...) ___...___ (...) 12345678901234567890...7890123456 (...) (25 years ago, 4-May-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
  Re: Length of lines
 
(...) If it was 80, and most screens were 80x24, as soon as the first quote happened it would wrap wrong. :) 72 has been the de-facto standard for as long as I can remember (i think? was it ever mentioned in an RFC?). (25 years ago, 5-May-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
  Re: Length of lines
 
(...) 80 is the width of the "standard" screen, but messages should be wrapped somewhat before that. (25 years ago, 5-May-01, to lugnet.admin.general)

Message is in Reply To:
  Length of lines
 
I see a lot of posts with long lines. Typically around 75-80. The problem with these is that when people quote them, they become even longer, and eventually they are broken by some clients. A common rule on USENET is to keep the line length below 72 (...) (25 years ago, 4-May-01, to lugnet.admin.general)

7 Messages in This Thread:





Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR