 | | Re: Weird "feature" of leaving notes on sets
|
|
(...) Ideally the sort would go by timestamp. --Todd (25 years ago, 16-Feb-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Weird "feature" of leaving notes on sets
|
|
(...) Thanks for confirming what I had surmised, but you didn't comment on whether you thought that was a good thing or not. Like I said, it's a nit. ++Lar (25 years ago, 16-Feb-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Weird "feature" of leaving notes on sets
|
|
(...) Sort is by member id number. --Todd (25 years ago, 16-Feb-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Lugnet.lego.direct and its charter
|
|
(...) I'd like to know about this as well. The signal-to-noise ratio is just too low in that group now. I've resigned myself to avoiding the thing completely as it now seems to be a complete waste of bandwidth. About all I find there is bickering (...) (25 years ago, 16-Feb-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Weird "feature" of leaving notes on sets
|
|
See, for instance: (URL) note shows up in front of Christian's, even though I just put it in now and his has been there for ages. If I had to guess, I would guess that it's because my member number is lower (if you look at sets that have notes by (...) (25 years ago, 16-Feb-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
