 | | Re: Libertarian debate in danger of pollution (was Re: Will Libertopia cause the needy to get less?
|
|
(...) I would like to see .debate be able to exist as something worthwhile, but I sense that with each debate which explodes into a ravaging god vs science debate, we lose another of the folks who are interested in serious debate. I'm not sure how (...) (25 years ago, 4-Dec-00, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Libertarian debate in danger of pollution (was Re: Will Libertopia cause the needy to get less?
|
|
(...) Oops. My bad. I should have caught that, but as you say, I was away for what has got to be one of the biggest weeks on l.o-t.d and was racing to mow through hundreds of posts. At this point I'm overwhelmed and haven't even looked at the (...) (25 years ago, 3-Dec-00, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Libertarian debate in danger of pollution (was Re: Will Libertopia cause the needy to get less?
|
|
(...) Some thoughts: - I've wondered if .debate should have a no-crossposting rule, except for crossposting in (which can easily be checked, for a post to be accepted which is cross-posted in .debate and any other group, it must be a followup to a (...) (25 years ago, 3-Dec-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Libertarian debate in danger of pollution (was Re: Will Libertopia cause the needy to get less?
|
|
(...) It leaked over here when a .debate novice set FUT incorrectly to point here just because something funny was said. I set the FUT back in my reply, but of course, once ONE post appears in a group, you always run the risk of latecomers missing (...) (25 years ago, 3-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Lugnet Contribution Idea? (Was: Re: Membership Packets)
|
|
(...) It's not possible, no. Security and privacy issues as well as technical logistics. What I need to do to break the bottleneck is change the way I print cards. Most of the steps of the other stuff are automated but there is a manual step with (...) (25 years ago, 3-Dec-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Lugnet Contribution Idea? (Was: Re: Membership Packets)
|
|
"Todd Lehman" <lehman@javanet.com> wrote in message news:G4zvoG.A4G@lugnet.com... (...) members? (...) Todd, Since it seems that the packets are behind often - what about opening up the task for members to do as a part of their donation to Lugnet? (...) (25 years ago, 3-Dec-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Membership Packets
|
|
(...) Good question. Yes. Unfortunately, we're behind on printing and mailing. On the other hand, they're only a formality rather than a prerequisite to interaction. I appreciate your patience. --Todd (25 years ago, 3-Dec-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Membership Packets
|
|
I was wondering: Are membership packets still being distributed to all paid LUGNET members? I know this was being done when the first 100 or so members signed up, and it included (from what I read) some pretty neat things. Since only a few people (...) (25 years ago, 3-Dec-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | migrate private set list to public list
|
|
Is there any easy way to migrate my private set list information in my membership webpage to the public list. I added it all as private (use to privacy on the NET) without thinking clearly about it :) Todd or whomever maintains the web forms, I (...) (25 years ago, 2-Dec-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Private boards?
|
|
(...) I think it was a technical issue. NNTP groups aren't easy to make private without password-protecting connections, etc. --Todd (25 years ago, 2-Dec-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
