 | | Re: My Stance
|
|
(...) Which is a succinct way of saying that he was basically a jerk. :) (26 years ago, 23-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: My Stance
|
|
(...) I think you may have misunderstood why I mentioned your member number (note I didn't mention mine). I also don't think your number should necessarily indicate you have some sort of status or "power" here. I referenced it simply because I (...) (26 years ago, 23-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: My Stance
|
|
(...) Gee, Lar--why do I have the feeling that this isn't an entirely hypothetical example? 8^) Dave! (26 years ago, 23-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: My Stance
|
|
(...) So would I. Of course, discussing it would imply the person with the negative opinion was around to discuss it. :D I'm really not saying that you should be forced to agree in any way with anything anyone says, or that you should not have the (...) (26 years ago, 23-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: My Stance
|
|
In lugnet.admin.general, Mike Stanley writes: <snip> (...) That statement I would not take as being a threat but like I said I don't know what people said to Todd privately and I assume there were many people writing Todd privately about the topic (...) (26 years ago, 23-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Colorized Images (was: Partsref Update)
|
|
(...) For the non-numeric among us: 0 - Black 1 - Blue 2 - Green 3 - Teal 4 - Red 5 - Dark Pink 6 - Brown 7 - Light Gray 8 - Dark Gray 9 - Light Blue 10 - Bright/Light Green 11 - Turquoise 12 - Scala Salmon (I'm winging it. This color is not a very (...) (26 years ago, 23-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Colorized Images (was: Partsref Update)
|
|
(...) These are great. Todd, might you have a few minutes to write a Random Part/Colour Generator like the Random Set Name Generator? Idea stimulants for CAD builders! By the way, these are nice for fountains: (URL) Heather -- Heather Patey Pirate (...) (26 years ago, 23-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: My Stance
|
|
(...) People seem to be suggesting, though, that one should not choose to voice that opinion. If person A can voice an opinion that persons B, C, and D find offensive (and to be honest - persons E, F, and G couldn't care less about) I'd say B, C, or (...) (26 years ago, 23-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: My Stance
|
|
(...) strongly (...) to (...) Well it wasn't *intended* as a witch hunt. More of a rhetorical question, because i'm not sure there *are* any people who still feel that someone should be tossed soley for opinions. <snip Mike's eloquent distinction (...) (26 years ago, 23-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: My Stance
|
|
(...) And/or perhaps in some cases overstated. Or overly stressed. (...) I sent Todd a few private e-mails on this subject (most of which dealt pretty specifically with apologizing for blowing my top and asking him to remove my emotionally charged (...) (26 years ago, 23-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: My Stance
|
|
(...) So would I. No one ever said you couldn't choose who to like and who not to like. (...) Actually, if I felt that way, yeah, I would be ashamed of myself. (...) Just because he may have been here on Lugnet doesn't mean you *must* associate with (...) (26 years ago, 23-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: My Stance
|
|
(...) Wow, what a loaded question, especially given what seems(ed) like a reverse- witch-hunt. I'd like to state first that I realized Friday that I got WAY too worked up about this and posted some things that were, in some cases, petty and (...) (26 years ago, 23-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: My Stance
|
|
(...) Actually I'm not including myself to that a few remaining, but in case of any doubt, here is my reasoning, in which I tried to word it as much clear as possible: (URL) there is any flaws, replies would be really appreciated. Selçuk (26 years ago, 23-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: My Stance
|
|
(...) I just wanted to add that I agree with Eric J. once again. I know I and a few others were playing a bit of devils advocate durring this discussion. Thats mostly because I thought several peoples reasoning for banishment were misguided. There (...) (26 years ago, 23-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Colorized Images (was: Partsref Update)
|
|
In lugnet.admin.general, Todd Lehman writes: <snip> That rocks, man! Way cool. Thanks, Steve and Todd. (...) waterfall in a diorama. (GMLTC didn't have a waterfall in the last layout for lack of trans blue bricks, and for lack of place to put it) (26 years ago, 23-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: My Stance
|
|
(...) I agree. However... I think that there were people who felt that way initially, but that many, if not all, have come around to reject that view. And that's a good thing. For the few remaining, can you identify yourselves and post reasons why (...) (26 years ago, 23-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Colorized Images (was: Partsref Update)
|
|
How 'bout Chrome BURPS!!? (...) (26 years ago, 23-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Colorized Images (was: Partsref Update)
|
|
(...) Full-on swingage! OK, I see the other colors there too now. Man, this fully rocks! These are nice and very small and _very_ quick to load. (...) Yup, that's great. (...) Fine too! (...) OK, I got 'em up now, and the URLs go like this: (URL) (...) (26 years ago, 23-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: My Stance
|
|
(...) I think Eric meant it as wise advice. --Todd (26 years ago, 23-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: My Stance
|
|
(...) Me too. (...) Not sure why he needs to be very careful, since the decision years from now whether or not to banish someone else will still be Todd's decision to make, not mine or yours or anyone else's (unless Todd decides to make it someone (...) (26 years ago, 23-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
