 | | Re: A reixamination of what happened.
|
|
(...) Sign... I wish I can also do or say anything and expect others to take it easily if I got "very angry". You must be very special to have such privilege. (...) And people can't take your remarks on your public site personally because? (...) And (...) (26 years ago, 22-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Todd! Admin and owner
|
|
(...) Well I don't know how specific you want but without nameing names I will try. I also assume you want specifics as to what I don't like about the reasoning for banning Matthew not reasoning for not liking Matthew. It is my feeling that there (...) (26 years ago, 22-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: When is a website "independent" and when is it "part of"?
|
|
G'day Mike, I've already posted my personal points on this issue: (URL) I'll reinforce them for my part... (...) Why should the ToS of this site be relevant to off-site content? If the message posting the link (exluding the link itself) abides by (...) (26 years ago, 22-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: hackin the faq
|
|
(...) Would'a replied earlier if I saw it!! (...) You're doing a very good job (and great for the community)! I'm sure many will appreciate it, whether old-timers or newbies. (...) Good idea! [..] (...) Definitely! You might want to have a cross-ref (...) (26 years ago, 22-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.faq)
|
| |
| | Re: When is a website "independent" and when is it "part of"?
|
|
(...) way? (...) I'd agree with the argument. And I think I'd go one step further. If I maintain a site at www.isecretlyhatetodd.com and I never mention it here, I'm not sure I should be held accountable ToS-wise if someone stumbles across it and (...) (26 years ago, 22-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
