 | | Re: Todd! Admin and owner
|
|
Todd Lehman wrote in message ... (...) I think you got it the second time ;-) you need to do a little practice in "swenglish", or me in english. LOL It was a good answer, and I think you deliberately made it loooong to keep me busy for a while;-) (...) (26 years ago, 21-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | No tolerance proposal.
|
|
I know that some people do not think I am sincere in my apologies and they want to see me banned. I would however like to make a no tolerance proposal. Basically I think that I should be on a sort of probation period for say the next three months. (...) (26 years ago, 21-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Todd! Admin and owner
|
|
(...) My professional opinion is I'm concerned that the arguments of the past 36 hours have been more about Matthew and his continued presence or non-presence and less about the underlying issues he was trying to raise. Perhaps the collective mind (...) (26 years ago, 21-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: My Stance
|
|
(...) No, I'm pretty sure we are, since there are people that are still telling Todd they want to see him banned permanently. I don't think that's right, and apparently (based on other people's posts here) I'm not alone in thinking that. Based on (...) (26 years ago, 21-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Todd! Admin and owner
|
|
(...) I don't understand the question. --Todd (26 years ago, 21-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: My Stance
|
|
Well said, Larry. Build On! John Matthews Larry Pieniazek <lpieniazek@mercator.com> wrote in message news:G2rA03.5Gt@lugnet.com... (...) site, (...) about (...) what (...) although (...) about (...) announcement (...) mostly (...) fundamental (...) (...) (26 years ago, 21-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Todd! Admin and owner
|
|
*Well, maybe I do not have the knowledge to speak/write in the language oher than my own, but hey, I'm here to learn* Todd! I think that the service you provide us/me is more than I/we could ever have been asking for. I think that the service you (...) (26 years ago, 21-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: My Stance
|
|
(...) LEGO (...) do (...) he (...) Well, yes and no. :-) Todd's manifesto was so well written, so thoughtful, so detailed, and so ahead of its time that when *I* read it, I begged Todd to come to Cambridge Technology Partners (1) as a consultant for (...) (26 years ago, 21-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: My Stance
|
|
(...) I think we are not talking about "excluding him from Lugnet", he is already excluded in some way, and not for his web content. What we are talking about is whether his apologies are sincere or not. And his web content makes me believing the (...) (26 years ago, 21-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: My Stance
|
|
(...) Sorry, but I don't. (...) He's simply stating some things he doesn't like about the Lego community as he sees it. What's the problem with that? Once again, what it comes down to is this: Over on *his* site, which you are under no obligation to (...) (26 years ago, 21-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
