|
|
 | | Re: advanced search options?
|
| (...) Here's the best answer I can give for now: (URL) How do I tell the search function to return only those posts (...) There isn't a way to search that way. These aren't captured by the current indexer. --Todd (26 years ago, 11-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Noncompliant software (was: Re: Incorrect group posting)
|
| (...) Benjamin may not have control over what mailer his employer uses, but he certainly has control over whether or not his messages appear threaded. If he posts using software that works correctly, his messages will appear threaded. If he posts (...) (26 years ago, 11-Oct-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.loc.us, lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
| | | | | Re: Incorrect group posting [was RE: cartoonnetwork.com is having an online contest]
|
| Now hold up a sec! Whilst I agree with Todd, berating Benjamin over something he has no control over won't actually accomplish anything. He has stated, previously, that he has no control over what the server admins do on their machines, and I (...) (26 years ago, 10-Oct-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.loc.us, lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: hackin the faq
|
| And as the Oops page notes, I really meant: (URL) Clark" <cary@corp.nospamwebtv.net> wrote in message news:G28Jsz.BFu@lugnet.com... (...) question, (...) The (...) on (...) for (...) is (...) made (...) transclusion[3] (...) (26 years ago, 10-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.faq)
| | | | | hackin the faq
|
| I've spent a few moments paying around with the LUGNET FAQ in FTX. Starting with (URL) (the batch that Jeremy Sproat created some time ago) I've put a whopping total of three of them here: (URL) tried to preserve the original FAQ entries content, (...) (26 years ago, 10-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.faq)
|
|
