|
|
 | | (canceled)
|
| | | | | | Re: LUGNET Memberships
|
| (...) ahh.... at least they have that one little thing that means so much to me... FDIC insured. :) (26 years ago, 27-Sep-00, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.people)
| | | | | Re: LUGNET Memberships
|
| (...) Actually I found PayPal's pw filter to be fairly stringent. KL (26 years ago, 27-Sep-00, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: Password Tips
|
| (...) Here's a good one: Long,Term/P1an! Passed with +178% I think I've got the hang of it now. (...) Delaying positive and negative results and temporarally blocking ip's for logins that have too many tries is probably the best way to discourage (...) (26 years ago, 27-Sep-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: LUGNET Memberships
|
| (...) A combination of things... first, by then there will be more things in place that will matter more; second, the pw validator will very likely be less stringent; third, I predict that within the next nine months, a major online banking site (...) (26 years ago, 27-Sep-00, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: Password Tips
|
| (...) Gee, that was so funny I almost forgot to laugh. There are plenty of 6-character pw's that you can use that have 5 letters and one number or special character, and plenty of 7-character pw's that you can use that are all lowercase letters. I (...) (26 years ago, 27-Sep-00, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Password Tips
|
| (...) I just figured out how to easially pass the LUGNET pw test. Use lots of special characters. This one: ^n).F6'%#*><}{#: scores a whopping 900% with no warnings. Just make sure you throw in a number a lower case letter and an upper case letter (...) (26 years ago, 27-Sep-00, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Set List Question
|
| I have just started listing and evaluating my sets using the new LUGNET set list feature. In the noties field, I put a "PIB" code that would help me determine if I had the Pieces, Instructions, and Box for the set I was entering. I just realized (...) (26 years ago, 27-Sep-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: LUGNET Memberships
|
| (...) What? You mean there's more to LUGNET than sparring about passwords and spam? As to the link, thanks, new I had scene it B4. I never knead dictionaries, personally, except when siteing to refute... Just ask me, I'll be glad to tell you wot a (...) (26 years ago, 27-Sep-00, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: LUGNET Memberships
|
| (...) Maybe Todd will finally unveil his gigantic space minifig colony. He's been promising it since '98 .... That would be something to see! I'm not laughing any more :-O - Dan (26 years ago, 27-Sep-00, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: LUGNET Memberships
|
| (...) LOL, no not that. :) --Todd (26 years ago, 27-Sep-00, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: LUGNET Memberships
|
| (...) Huh? Ther is only one thing I can think of that has a nine month completion cycle, and it doesn't have a thing to do with passwords. Could you elaborate? KL (26 years ago, 27-Sep-00, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: LUGNET Memberships
|
| (...) heh, I wouldn't know anything about the newsreader, but it shouldn't be hard to put in the mail gateway... and that would certify the sender... however, for the web interface (after thinking about it more), you want it to me a lot more (...) (26 years ago, 27-Sep-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: LUGNET Memberships
|
| (...) Oh, I was thinking of something newsreader-based. It'd be more of a pain for the web interface. Unless someone wants to hack something into Mozilla. :) Once upon a time, Verisign was making a big deal over personal certificates. Guess they (...) (26 years ago, 26-Sep-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: LUGNET Memberships
|
| (...) hmmm... now there's a thought.... how would that work though? make a private/public key pair for each member, and store the public key in the cookie? but what would stop someone from sniffing and stealing the cookie? auth over ssl? hmmm.... (...) (26 years ago, 26-Sep-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: LUGNET Memberships
|
| (...) University of Oxford. <ftp://ftp.ox.ac.uk/...rdlists/>. Wordlists have non-password related uses too, apparently. :) (26 years ago, 26-Sep-00, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: LUGNET Memberships
|
| (...) I don't find it funny; I'm just glad it hasn't been a problem. It'd be nice to hack in some sort of GPG-based authentication system.... (26 years ago, 26-Sep-00, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: Password checks (was: Re: LUGNET Memberships)
|
| (...) No, I meant exactly that: I didn't think that anyone would ever (a) forget their password or (b) not be able to just go look it up. When you put it in a cookie, you don't even have to remember it beyond that, unless you move to different (...) (26 years ago, 26-Sep-00, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: Crossword question
|
| (...) Ya, when Suzanne showed it to me a while back, I was blown away. I guess it's like professional sw that's used by some real cw makers. (...) Exactly -- it's not part of the core system, and nothing except itself depends on it, and Java is (...) (26 years ago, 26-Sep-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: Password checks (was: Re: LUGNET Memberships)
|
| (...) Huh? Todd, I hope you meant to write, "I didn't think about dealing with people forgetting their passwords". People forget passwords *all* *the* *time*. That's why so many sites have such ridiculously unsecure password requirements -- so (...) (26 years ago, 26-Sep-00, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.general)
|
|
