| |
In lugnet.lego.direct, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> Briefly because I'm at a client site and can't chat as much as I'd like.
>
> In lugnet.lego.direct, Todd Lehman writes:
> > In lugnet.lego.direct, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> > > [...]
> > > To reiterate: You do exercise editorial control here, please keep doing so.
> >
> > I absolutely and vehemently disagree with the assertion that editorial • control
> > is being or has ever been exerted.
> >
> > Perhaps we are working from different definitions of the term...?
>
> Ding ding ding! Yes!
>
> > My working
> > definition of "editorial control" is to edit or delete all or portions of
> > something based on its content on non-technical or non-legal grounds.
>
> I definitely and without a doubt agree
I would agree with that too. But what I am interested in is what were the legal
grounds for the censorship?
Scott A
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: 2001 Set info
|
| (...) What, are you TRYING to annoy me here? You've edited Todd's and my words by trimming away most of the sentence to make it look like I am agreeing with Todd's definition. Gentle readers, do not be fooled by Scott's action here. Scott, I'm (...) (26 years ago, 9-Aug-00, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.admin.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: 2001 Set info
|
| Briefly because I'm at a client site and can't chat as much as I'd like. (...) Ding ding ding! Yes! (...) I definitely and without a doubt agree that you do not do that specific thing (whatever you or I call it) here and if anyone is thinking that I (...) (26 years ago, 9-Aug-00, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.admin.general)
|
176 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
