Subject:
|
Re: Qustion about search function for Todd Lehmann.
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Tue, 6 Jun 2000 10:28:45 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
174 times
|
| |
![Post a public reply to this message](/news/icon-reply.gif) | |
In lugnet.admin.general, Geoffrey Hyde writes:
> It would be nice if lugnet search option could include an option to require
> ALL keywords to be found to make a match, or at the very least, prioritize
> searches in a percentage rating, with 100% having everything someone
> searched for, and going downwards from that.
It does support the boolean operators '+' and '-', eg. if you wanted to see
posts from all the Richard's that aren't me: "+richard -franks" does that.
I'm not quite sure how the search prioritises, it's been discussed in this
group before, but I couldn't find it with a 5 min search :)
Richard
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
![](/news/x.gif) | | Qustion about search function for Todd Lehmann.
|
| Does your lugnet search function prioritize according to words used in the search. For instance would it make any difference if I rearranged the following search words or can I put them in any particular order? minfig accessories castle It doesn't (...) (24 years ago, 6-Jun-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
3 Messages in This Thread: ![Qustion about search function for Todd Lehmann. -Geoffrey Hyde (6-Jun-00 to lugnet.admin.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![You are here](/news/here.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Qustion about search function for Todd Lehmann. -Huw Millington (8-Jun-00 to lugnet.admin.general)](/news/x.gif)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|