| |
I'll second these sentiments. Unfortunately, due to a combination of bad
email server here, and software that doesn't recognise re: as an addition to
a thread at the other end, my messages [including this, no doubt] seem to
get lost in the ether...Anyway, WE WANT OUR OWN MARKETPLACE , and we'd also
like Mark to be able to post in .au
[to compensate for the new group, I'd agree to drom the .au groups to .au,
.qld, .nsw, .vic, .tas, .act, .sa, .nt, .wa, .tradingpost (?) ]
Benjamin Whytcross
BWhytcro@PacificAccess.com.au
Ph: (03) 9856 5282
Directory Technology Pty Ltd
1/436 Elgar Road,
Box Hill, 3128
Growing older is compulsory..Growing up isn't :-)
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Peter White [mailto:aztekium@optusnet.com.au]
> Sent: Thursday, June 01, 2000 2:40 PM
> To: lugnet.loc.au@lugnet.com; lugnet.admin.general@lugnet.com
> Subject: Re: Question for Todd Regarding Mark Harrison
>
>
> In lugnet.loc.au, Peter Callaway writes:
> > > In lugnet.loc.au, Todd Lehman writes:
> >
> > This comes back to an issue I raised a while ago.
> > http://www.lugnet.com/admin/terms/?n=86 (and follow the • thread through)
> >
> > > > Write me when you've (collectively) decided that you (as a • group) feel
> > > > assured that Mark can and will play fair (by the rules) • and I'll turn his
> > > > posting privileges back on, based on your good word as a group.
>
> It's difficult to vouch for someone who lives 1000km away
> (lots of miles!)
> Surely a stiffer penalty would have been to ban him from
> everywhere except
> loc.au or even just Brisbane.
>
> > However, to get back on-topic (or where I want to take this • topic), my initial
> > comments a month ago were that the most frequent users of • loc.au (largely, but
> > not necessarily only, Australians) don't mind these sorts of • posts in the
> > loc.au group. I personally welcome them as I tend not to • frequent the market
> > groups due to lack of relevance, since they are mainly • dominated by US-related
> > market issues, and you could argue that a post about • sales/auctions in
> > Australia are relevant to the loc.au group.
> >
> > As a regular contributor to the loc.au group I would rather • we petition Todd
> > to alter the T&C's to allow market posts in the loc.au group • rather than
> > collectively vouch for MarkH not violating these same T&C's again.
>
> This is the key issue here. Not what Mark will/will not do,
> let's just move
> the goalposts.
> Here's the wedding ceremony clause: anyone from loc.au who is
> averse to
> market-related posts should speak now or forever...
>
> > If things got out of hand we could always revert back, but I • doubt this would
> > happen given the distinct lack of market activity in • Australia (but that's
> > another issue ;-)
> >
> > I don't want to see a loc.au.market group created as we • already have too many
> > groups under loc.au for the number of regular contributors • (although we are
> > growing :-). If Todd feels it is necessary to create this • group, then I would
> > suggest closing a few of the other sub-groups and • maintaining only the
> > state/territory groups.
>
> One ng per state is definitely enough, otherwise most will be
> talking to
> themselves.
> >
> > Comments, anyone???
>
> Mark's not the messiah(he's just...),he does have the no.2
> collection in Oz.
> I cant see the sandgroper optometrist siblings posting in the future.
>
> pete.w <aquanaut@optusnet.com.au>
>
|
|
1 Message in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
