Subject:
|
Re: Reconsidering .admin.council group
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Tue, 25 Apr 2000 01:28:46 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
570 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.general, Todd Lehman writes:
> In lugnet.admin.general, Frank Filz writes:
> > Removing lugnet.admin.council does sound like a good idea, but it might be
> > worthwhile to keep the messages and a pointer to them somewhere. There is
> > some valuable discussion there, though expressing editorial control over
> > what is kept accessible and what is not, is problematical. If a link is just
> > put on the lugnet.admin.terms page in the links section, it would be
> > accessible, but remove the appearance of being an active part of Lugnet.
>
> I was planning to remove it from the active list of groups, which would mean
> that it wouldn't show up in newsreaders or on this old page anymore,
>
> http://www.lugnet.com/news/groups/index/
>
> but all the messages would still appear archived at the website if invoked
> via URL -- kinda like the way the .off-topic.qotd messages are still actually
> there, and some of the subgroups of .loc.uk.
That sounds reasonable (and goes with your "never delete messages" ideal).
Frank
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Reconsidering .admin.council group
|
| (...) I was planning to remove it from the active list of groups, which would mean that it wouldn't show up in newsreaders or on this old page anymore, (URL) all the messages would still appear archived at the website if invoked via URL -- kinda (...) (25 years ago, 25-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
6 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
